Posts: 1,207
Threads: 74
Joined: Aug 2010
Thanks: 0
Given 1 thank(s) in 1 post(s)
very nice map:)))))
The middle part of the map is a nice flagging possibility because of the gema like jump :DD
Posts: 534
Threads: 10
Joined: Oct 2010
Thanks: 0
Given 0 thank(s) in 0 post(s)
Ooo finally it's released; it's a great map :D
Posts: 2,331
Threads: 45
Joined: Feb 2011
Thanks: 154
Given 55 thank(s) in 32 post(s)
Nice map! Good mix of familiarity with textures and layout but just different enough thanks to your 'style'. :D
Posts: 2,144
Threads: 38
Joined: Aug 2010
Thanks: 45
Given 26 thank(s) in 21 post(s)
Yeahhhh glad to see some new names releasing maps!
Keep up the good work!
Posts: 100
Threads: 6
Joined: Jun 2010
Thanks: 0
Given 3 thank(s) in 2 post(s)
02 Mar 13, 07:09AM
(This post was last modified: 02 Mar 13, 07:10AM by R4zor.)
A pretty nice map. Layout wise it's very open and most rooms have more than 2 entrances which is how it should be. The 3 entrances to the RVSF base vs the 4 entrances to CLA shouldn't pose too much issue but it's probably not ideal, not that I think you should change it now, it still flows well. Like Felix said, the paths do look a bit too cubic but it's not really your fault, honestly I don't think it looks much better in the screenshots he posted above.
Another thing about the snow I think you should definitely try is have bumps and heightfields. Currently 80% of the snow is on the same level as the concrete and top of boxes which doesn't make much sense; it should be raised. It might take a bit of fiddly work but it'll have a good effect in the end.
Good layout, good texture choices, the detail is pretty good from my perspective apart from what I first mentioned, nice job.
Posts: 308
Threads: 12
Joined: Aug 2010
Thanks: 0
Given 0 thank(s) in 0 post(s)
02 Mar 13, 08:00AM
(This post was last modified: 02 Mar 13, 08:01AM by Aekom.)
I'm picturing some intense firefights in that alleyway on the west side of the map. Great job btw!
Posts: 23
Threads: 5
Joined: Aug 2012
Thanks: 0
Given 0 thank(s) in 0 post(s)
02 Mar 13, 12:46PM
(This post was last modified: 02 Mar 13, 12:50PM by aNytHe0ne.)
Ty guys for comments.
@Fate: I tested so many things and always reverted back to the original layout idea, that's why it took so long :D.
@Nightmare: I'm using that strategy for many things, not just mapping: standard stuff + a touch of my hand ;)
@Felix and R4zor: I admit that ground detailing is my weak spot, so I will have to work more on it in my future releases.
One of the reasons why I didn't do much height fielding is that the map is quite expensive already in some spots. It's not really a reason though to leave it that way.
Balance wise, I believe RVSF side is in slight disadvantage, mostly because of smaller base which is harder to defend, but only time will tell.