Introducing demoSHACK
#31
(10 Dec 12, 01:30AM)Habluka Wrote:
(10 Dec 12, 01:29AM)Andrez Wrote: It's cool for its simple design, but I would use yellow-orange text and black background. Same for the buttons, I think it's more relaxing for our eyes.

also, a font with curved edges like comic sans would make it even more relaxing
Ay don't go messing with comic sans.
Comic sans means serious business.
Thanks given by:
#32
how about make it look something like this?
[Image: 1zfhQ.png]
Thanks given by:
#33
^Absofruitly hideous color scheme. Almost couldn't read the text at the bottom.
Comic sans ftw.
Thanks given by:
#34
* Orynge approves but wishes everyone would stop making these.
Seriously, I can name about 5 off the top of my head.
Thanks given by:
#35
(10 Dec 12, 06:58AM)Orynge Wrote: * Orynge approves but wishes everyone would stop making these.
Seriously, I can name about 5 off the top of my head.
5 what?
Thanks given by:
#36
Demo uploading sites.
demoSHACK, SilverCloud, one that I've been asked not mention publicly, one made by XRD, and a few others like AC Weekend Cup (which, although not allowing any regular old demo, still lets you upload demos).
Thanks given by:
#37
I'm still scratching my head as to how people are running these on webhosting.

I have never, ever, ever seen a webhost or a VPS provider that allowed for a file hosting site. Unless you are running this on a home connection I'm pretty sure people are violating their TOSes by running these.
Thanks given by:
#38
(10 Dec 12, 07:15AM)Zarjio Wrote: I'm still scratching my head as to how people are running these on webhosting.

I have never, ever, ever seen a webhost or a VPS provider that allowed for a file hosting site. Unless you are running this on a home connection I'm pretty sure people are violating their TOSes by running these.

You have to realize that most vps providers don't give a shit about it unless people go whine to them because they never realized that they can do something that is against the rules. If you do have a problem with going against the TOS, there are really easy ways to avoid hosting on their servers without having it run on a home connection.
Thanks given by:
#39
(10 Dec 12, 04:38AM)Habluka Wrote: how about make it look something like this?
http://puu.sh/1zfhQ.png
mmh thanks for your efforts, but i think i'll leave it as it is now
Thanks given by:
#40
(10 Dec 12, 07:15AM)Zarjio Wrote: I have never, ever, ever seen a webhost or a VPS provider that allowed for a file hosting site. Unless you are running this on a home connection I'm pretty sure people are violating their TOSes by running these.
Well, I have never seen any which impose such stupid and arbitrary limitations (of course, I don't doubt they exist). Most actually don't care what you run, as long as you stay below your transfer cap. The only thing I know many disallow is P2P.
Thanks given by:
#41
(10 Dec 12, 04:38AM)Habluka Wrote: how about make it look something like this?
[img]green[/img]

[Image: michelangelo2.jpg]
Thanks given by: