Posts: 729
Threads: 16
Joined: Dec 2012
Thanks: 30
Given 15 thank(s) in 6 post(s)
03 Mar 15, 01:02AM
(This post was last modified: 03 Mar 15, 01:02AM by PhaNtom.)
It was like that for UE3 too f0r3v3r...although I think the percentage was higher.
Also, HYPE HYPE HYPE I'VE BEEN WAITING FOREVER FOR THIS
Edit: Yeah, it was 15% before.
Posts: 444
Threads: 31
Joined: Mar 2011
Thanks: 20
Given 14 thank(s) in 10 post(s)
I'm still thinking that Cube2 game engine it's great.
Posts: 638
Threads: 10
Joined: Jun 2010
Thanks: 6
Given 30 thank(s) in 16 post(s)
03 Mar 15, 09:52AM
(This post was last modified: 03 Mar 15, 09:53AM by Mr.Floppy.)
First off, this isn't new. The Unreal UDK has been around for years and has been free to non-commercial projects as well.
Secondly, this is a forum and not your personal twitter account. Just posting a link about something is not how to start a serious conversation. We can only guess what you want to say, no matter how obvious your intends may seem.
Thirdly, have we finally agreed on not caring about low-end machine compatibilty anymore? If that was indeed the case, I'd rather go with Cube2 or even better, eihrul's Tesseract-Cube2, since it has a sandbox editor, dynamic lighting and not that high-end professional tools, which take quite a lot of time to master.
I played around with the Unreal 3 UDK about 2 years ago and was quite impressed. Though, it is somewhat 'over the top' for a mainly community driven project, in my opinion. See, it already takes about 20 to 30 hours to get one decent map created with the current editor, which is rather self-explanatory. The UDK on the contrary is very complex to say the least. I do think it is userfriendly, though quite on another level compared to how things work on AC or Sauerbraten/Tesseract.
Posts: 2,387
Threads: 56
Joined: Aug 2010
Thanks: 24
Given 94 thank(s) in 55 post(s)
If you don't want people to read what you write, don't write it instead of using the 333333 colour...
