Posts: 241
Threads: 3
Joined: Jun 2010
Quote:You have about a month to test iCTF (TOSOK with flags) and improve your knife game on our iCTF mod server at:
/modconnect de.mysick.tk 20032
The server works with AC 1103 and 1104. Vote CTF for iCTF and LSS for knife only. Thanks to Ronald Reagan for the mod source.
from http://www.mysick.tk/index.php?site=news...newsID=113
Hope you enjoy.
Posts: 2,841
Threads: 44
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 378
Threads: 8
Joined: Jun 2010
iCTF is awesome :D very very awesome
a little too easy spawnkill in iTDM :D
Posts: 2,067
Threads: 11
Joined: Jun 2010
I would love to try this if my PC wasn't glitchy :D
Posts: 241
Threads: 3
Joined: Jun 2010
We had some cool games, this was very fun:
Posts: 162
Threads: 8
Joined: Jun 2010
When TOSOK and CTF had baby's it created iCTF because its TOSOK just with CTF flags :D
You can only have a sniper and only have 1hp.
You do not have pickups.
Really fun to play :)
Posts: 31
Threads: 4
Joined: Oct 2010
Wow! i tried it out and it was AWESOME! the only don side is that the server is hidden at the very bottom of the server list so no one joins :(
Posts: 3,462
Threads: 72
Joined: Jun 2010
Wait, these even get onto the server list? I thought they were just hidden. Cool stuff :D
Anyways, we have to do that so it doesn't get the server banned. It is under a mod protocol.
Posts: 31
Threads: 4
Joined: Oct 2010
yeah its on the list at the very bottom with the servers that have "older protocol" :P
Posts: 3,462
Threads: 72
Joined: Jun 2010
Ah, well that is because the protocol is lower, meaning older.
Posts: 31
Threads: 4
Joined: Oct 2010
yeah. but anyway, is this a "just for fun" server or will the ictf and itdm modes be implemented into futur assault cube versions for all to play on?
Posts: 1,331
Threads: 44
Joined: Jun 2010
Any servers that you connect to get added to your list, so whether or not the masterserver is listing it is redundant.
Posts: 3,462
Threads: 72
Joined: Jun 2010
Well, I am not sure of panda's motives, but I think servers like these (with ideas only roughed up) can give people an idea for gameplay and whether or not it is a good idea. As far as I know there is no planned iCTF or iTDM planned.
Posts: 241
Threads: 3
Joined: Jun 2010
Well, I just wanted to see how insta ctf felt in AC, since it's the most popular Sauer mode it seems. (We just started a Sauer clan.) The mode is pretty neat, although I much prefer it in Sauer because it's less random chance there and it has faster movement and bigger maps. I wouldn't mind having it in AC too tho, most maps can be a lot of fun in iCTF if they are not too full.
Posts: 31
Threads: 4
Joined: Oct 2010
is there any way for others to set up a server like the one you made?
Posts: 102
Threads: 8
Joined: Sep 2010
Aw :( It was private today.
Posts: 3,462
Threads: 72
Joined: Jun 2010
@TeD, yes. However one is just enough, unless it catches on and tons of people play it... But I doubt another would be necessary.
Posts: 354
Threads: 19
Joined: Jun 2010
The problem I see with implementing this: Those who want to play normal ctf will hardly find anyone to play with, anymore because most players, especially new players will play ictf and never care much to play "normal". I have seen this happen in many games. Instagib is always doing this, if I had known before, I would have never allowed osok to be added back in 0.9x.
It's cool as a mod, but it won't get in the main game.
Posts: 481
Threads: 11
Joined: Jul 2010
14 Dec 10, 11:56PM
(This post was last modified: 15 Dec 10, 12:25AM by JGAN.)
no one is online :(
Posts: 3,462
Threads: 72
Joined: Jun 2010
Because its not playable on the MS, you got to bring people to your own match.
Posts: 354
Threads: 1
Joined: Jun 2010
Quote:Instagib is always doing this, if I had known before, I would have never allowed osok to be added back in 0.9x.
OHH A DEV WHO NOW THINKS OSOK WAS A BAD IDEA! WONDERFUL!
Can we get rid of (T)OSOK for next release?
Posts: 481
Threads: 11
Joined: Jul 2010
(15 Dec 10, 02:29AM)JMM Wrote: Quote:Instagib is always doing this, if I had known before, I would have never allowed osok to be added back in 0.9x.
OHH A DEV WHO NOW THINKS OSOK WAS A BAD IDEA! WONDERFUL!
Can we get rid of (T)OSOK for next release? LETS DO IT!!!
* JGAN watches 20 clans instantly fail at the next release x_x
@reagan, that kinda sucks :P
Posts: 3,780
Threads: 33
Joined: Jun 2010
LMAO @ all the hate mail JGAN and JMM are probably getting now.
Posts: 481
Threads: 11
Joined: Jul 2010
Super fun!! had some great games today, but the pistol is pissing me off :P I WANNA KNIFE!!
Posts: 534
Threads: 21
Joined: Jun 2010
I just wanna give a shout-out-out to all my people out there who haven't tried any iCTF yet, ya'll are missing out, ya'll gotta try some of this!
Posts: 250
Threads: 8
Joined: Jun 2010
(12 Dec 10, 12:23PM)makkE Wrote: The problem I see with implementing this: Those who want to play normal ctf will hardly find anyone to play with, anymore because most players, especially new players will play ictf and never care much to play "normal". I have seen this happen in many games. Instagib is always doing this, if I had known before, I would have never allowed osok to be added back in 0.9x.
It's cool as a mod, but it won't get in the main game.
Is it now a new fashion to not stay anymore to former decisions? OSOK is the only mode you can use somehow the sniper (the tactical use of it is low anyway comparing to other games). Anyway - a mode witch combines OSOK with CTF? Sorry, but this isn't THAT big thing imo, and not really a new invention. Modes like HTF and KTF were innovative cause with that a new gameplay and a change in tactics took place. Probably something like a "bomb defuse" mode would be a nice idea.
Posts: 1,436
Threads: 7
Joined: Jun 2010
Apollo: One look at Sauer's server list will probably cure you from your opinion once and for all.
Posts: 354
Threads: 19
Joined: Jun 2010
"Is it now a new fashion to not stay anymore to former decisions?"
You are mistaking this for an infailable institution that agreed on a sort of constitution back in 2004. I simply wasn't around when (t)osok was added, and only later came to realize how insta-type gametypes hurts "normal weapon" gameplay in many games (Cube,UT, Warsow, Sauerbraten, even Q3...).
So, just saying, if I knew then what I know now, tosok would have never happened. Forgive my puny imperfection.
Posts: 250
Threads: 8
Joined: Jun 2010
(16 Dec 10, 07:42PM)makkE Wrote: You are mistaking this for an infailable institution .... Infallable? Of course not. In my opinion there are several errors in the game design (for example teamplay is realized in that way that some people are just starting from the same base with the same color. In the most case every one is playing for his own in the team). But this doesn't mean that it isn't a fun game (otherwise I wouldn't play this for so long).
(16 Dec 10, 07:42PM)makkE Wrote: ...how insta-type gametypes hurts "normal weapon" gameplay...
In that case PF and LSS were mistakes also.
(16 Dec 10, 07:42PM)makkE Wrote: ... tosok ... which means, that one of the most played modes (isn't this a success?) wouldn't exist.
Beside this - that's my opinion - the whole gameplay (it doesn't matter which mode) doesn't fit to sniper guns that much anyway.
(16 Dec 10, 07:12PM)tempest Wrote: Apollo: One look at Sauer's server list will probably cure you from your opinion once and for all.
I don't do such comparisons, they are useless in my opinion.
Posts: 481
Threads: 11
Joined: Jul 2010
eh apollo, makke is right on some parts. tosok is played mostly by beginners and "n00bs" (no offense to anyone). the most skilled and true players rarely take part in it. the only reason its one of the most (over)played modes is because of ac_desert and ac_douze, and a lot of crap maps. challenge almost any "n00b-cruiter" clans and they will call tosok on ac_douze :P
also, i dont understand how pf and lss were mistakes? they are not insta-type modes.
makke, you dont have to integrate this as a standard. its just fun, like a gema. play around with it :]
|