02 Feb 12, 12:20AM
"...free software..." in this context is a licensing term, not a cost indication. Like wise, "...proprietary..." simply means they're not releasing the code for the server side of their distribution network. This is simply a way of keeping linux users happy about the open source nature of the software they install on their computer.
So, no, MG, you wouldn't have to pay; they already offer free (zero cost) games.
My heart says "no", I don't like the look of this, but I've never pretended to be a software developer and I'd welcome comments from more experienced/knowledgeable brains.
So, no, MG, you wouldn't have to pay; they already offer free (zero cost) games.
My heart says "no", I don't like the look of this, but I've never pretended to be a software developer and I'd welcome comments from more experienced/knowledgeable brains.