What ever happened to the 'right to be considered innocent until proven guilty'? If there is no clear evidence that they've used cheats in a public match, why do we assume that they will?
Maybe there's a chance that they were only experimenting between each other, but were never planning on playing in a pub game. Who knows...my point is that we can't ban people on the assumption that they'll commit a ban-worthy offence without solid proof.
Maybe there's a chance that they were only experimenting between each other, but were never planning on playing in a pub game. Who knows...my point is that we can't ban people on the assumption that they'll commit a ban-worthy offence without solid proof.