If your going to take on the responsibility of a server, wouldn't it make sense to maintain your own blacklist as part of the big shabang? I don't understand why that's not the social norm.
But, giving everyone the benefit of the doubt, let's say time is the issue. Then a task force should provide some convenience.
There is no "right" or "wrong" way. Seems there has been a lot of success in some servers maintaining less main-stream form of BL'ing. To those people -- there is no pressure to conform. Keep doing what your doing! You should have confidence in the way you run your server.
For those responsible server owners who have attempted to keep a BL or are a little disappointed in the BL tools available -- you may find interest in a new short cut, there are individuals willing to volunteer their time to keep an updated BL for your DL'ing pleasure.
@ C4rma - I would hope that anyone with integrity would avoid such shallow means of furthering the recognition of themselves or their clan.
I will stand firm that the members need to be switched out yearly. All of us find busy times IRL that keep us from being active in AC from time to time.
- We'll need a council who will be up-to-date with activities going on around the community.
- We'll need to avoid the risk of trapping ourselves in with someone who is power hungry.
- We'll need frequent, fresh prospective on the new exploits that inevitably threaten each release.
- We'll need Someone who will honor the position, and commit to a reasonable and predictable time frame of duty in the council so AC and real life responsibilities don't choke him.
- We'll need someone who will not eventually become too lazy to review the evidence because "I've been doin' this for years. It's all the same"
- We'll need to avoid trapping ourselves in with someone who unexpectedly becomes bias to some members or groups, or uses anger to make decisions.
But, giving everyone the benefit of the doubt, let's say time is the issue. Then a task force should provide some convenience.
There is no "right" or "wrong" way. Seems there has been a lot of success in some servers maintaining less main-stream form of BL'ing. To those people -- there is no pressure to conform. Keep doing what your doing! You should have confidence in the way you run your server.
For those responsible server owners who have attempted to keep a BL or are a little disappointed in the BL tools available -- you may find interest in a new short cut, there are individuals willing to volunteer their time to keep an updated BL for your DL'ing pleasure.
@ C4rma - I would hope that anyone with integrity would avoid such shallow means of furthering the recognition of themselves or their clan.
I will stand firm that the members need to be switched out yearly. All of us find busy times IRL that keep us from being active in AC from time to time.
- We'll need a council who will be up-to-date with activities going on around the community.
- We'll need to avoid the risk of trapping ourselves in with someone who is power hungry.
- We'll need frequent, fresh prospective on the new exploits that inevitably threaten each release.
- We'll need Someone who will honor the position, and commit to a reasonable and predictable time frame of duty in the council so AC and real life responsibilities don't choke him.
- We'll need someone who will not eventually become too lazy to review the evidence because "I've been doin' this for years. It's all the same"
- We'll need to avoid trapping ourselves in with someone who unexpectedly becomes bias to some members or groups, or uses anger to make decisions.