Hmmm, interesting
#1
I’ve played a few games on the pubs with the latest issue; all in all, very nice thank you.
It could still do with makke’s texture overhaul, but I’ve never had a problem with the graphics.
The extra armour blends in rather well, good job again makke.
The change in armour vest strength makes for some interesting game play. Not absolutely sure it was necessary but have it right I suppose is the correct way to go.
It does mean the player with the double vest on is very hard to take down, but……
Interesting to note that despite the obvious benefits of all the extra armour the majority of players still rush for the nades first but hey, what’s new there.
Also interesting the number of players who still hope to get that headshot by wildly aiming with the sniper; way to go sniper fans, you’re gonna die.
All the GUI tweaks don’t mean a lot to me as a player; maybe I haven’t spent enough time experimenting to cast judgment on their worth. But, sure, it looks more “modern” and everything I’ve seen is easy to read.
In game attitude doesn’t seem to have changed an awful lot; don’t wear a tag and create a bit of havoc and many players piss off. I think they are more reluctant to shout “cheat” given the new anti cheat measures but….
There are still some seriously laggy servers and that shouldn’t really be happening.
The carbine looks nice but I think it is still at a major disadvantage compared to the rest of the weapons, even the pistol is a better survival bet. I would have gone for an increased fire rate for the carbine leaving the clip and accuracy as it is.
Less nade bounce….. cool.
Less nades…….even cooler.
Only time will tell how effective the anti cheat measures are going to be. However, well done Brahma for getting it sorted.
Overall on the game front, I think it’s a great improvement. Okay, it’s lost a bit of the arcade appeal and I can understand why many seasoned ac addicts are going to have problems with the new features.

With regard to the community.
Who on earth let the RandumIdiot wipe out years of ac forum history? What a terrible and totally unforgivable mistake.
So what happened, new regime eradicating past errors from the public eye on their rise to power?

Also very disappointed to see some “players”, you know, the cheating scum so many of us tried so hard over the years to eradicate from the game back on the pubs and the forums like nothing ever happened; some still using their original name, other sneaking about under various aliases.
I can’t imagine who could possibly be responsible for this……….well, wallow in shite and you’ll never scrub yourself clean, some may say.

My initial impressions lead me to thinking that maybe ac has unfortunately in my eyes developed into a two tier game; seasoned clan players playing private matches while the pubs cater for the newer players. I suppose there has always been that tendency but in my opinion all skill levels playing together seemed best for the game and the quickest way to improve the skill of the newer players.
Anyway, thanks for the game improvements devs
Thanks given by:


Messages In This Thread
Hmmm, interesting - by tipper|DES| - 21 Aug 10, 07:14PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by Robtics - 21 Aug 10, 07:31PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by tempest - 21 Aug 10, 08:49PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by Brahma - 21 Aug 10, 09:34PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by MorganKell - 22 Aug 10, 05:07PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by Brahma - 22 Aug 10, 06:15PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by Apollo{TyD} - 22 Aug 10, 06:29PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by MykeGregory - 22 Aug 10, 06:34PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by MorganKell - 22 Aug 10, 07:12PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by Brahma - 22 Aug 10, 07:14PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by MorganKell - 22 Aug 10, 07:32PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by Gibstick - 22 Aug 10, 11:45PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by DrauL - 23 Aug 10, 04:45AM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by Mael - 23 Aug 10, 05:09AM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by DrauL - 23 Aug 10, 05:25AM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by Zarjio - 23 Aug 10, 05:48AM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by Bullpup - 26 Aug 10, 09:10PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by Zarjio - 27 Aug 10, 12:53AM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by Panda - 27 Aug 10, 02:38AM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by jAcKRoCk* - 27 Aug 10, 03:13AM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by Ronald_Reagan - 27 Aug 10, 04:21AM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by Panda - 27 Aug 10, 04:58PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by jAcKRoCk* - 28 Aug 10, 12:38AM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by Luc@s - 27 Aug 10, 05:29PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by tipper|DES| - 29 Aug 10, 03:30PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by Kirin - 29 Aug 10, 05:59PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by tipper|DES| - 29 Aug 10, 06:49PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by Kirin - 29 Aug 10, 08:45PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by tipper|DES| - 30 Aug 10, 09:59PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by Ronald_Reagan - 31 Aug 10, 06:57AM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by V-Man - 31 Aug 10, 07:24AM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by jamz - 31 Aug 10, 10:19AM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by DrauL - 31 Aug 10, 07:25AM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by Luc@s - 31 Aug 10, 08:45AM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by V-Man - 31 Aug 10, 07:32AM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by DrauL - 31 Aug 10, 09:53AM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by Kirin - 31 Aug 10, 03:00PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by DrauL - 01 Sep 10, 05:19AM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by tipper|DES| - 01 Sep 10, 10:19AM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by ketar - 01 Sep 10, 11:02AM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by tipper|DES| - 01 Sep 10, 04:13PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by ketar - 01 Sep 10, 05:49PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by Kirin - 01 Sep 10, 02:28PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by ElCrema - 01 Sep 10, 06:33PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by tipper|DES| - 01 Sep 10, 06:45PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by ketar - 01 Sep 10, 07:38PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by Alien - 01 Sep 10, 07:03PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by Drakas - 01 Sep 10, 10:21PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by MorganKell - 02 Sep 10, 10:35AM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by Bullpup - 04 Sep 10, 04:23PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by Kirin - 04 Sep 10, 04:51PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by lordamit - 04 Sep 10, 08:11PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by titiPT - 05 Sep 10, 01:08AM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by V-Man - 05 Sep 10, 08:16AM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by Veritas - 06 Sep 10, 09:17PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by Undead - 10 Sep 10, 04:55AM
cheapest logo design - by FrankRay08 - 09 Sep 10, 07:13PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by tempest - 09 Sep 10, 08:17PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by titiPT - 09 Sep 10, 09:39PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by hikarikoifood - 10 Sep 10, 04:52AM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by MorganKell - 10 Sep 10, 05:56AM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by sollyminto - 10 Sep 10, 08:11AM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by titiPT - 10 Sep 10, 09:10AM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by Huntsman - 10 Sep 10, 12:06PM
RE: Hmmm, interesting - by tempest - 10 Sep 10, 02:43PM