09 Mar 11, 12:56AM
http://getyourwebsitehere.com/jswb/rttest01.html
here, now stop talking about it in the weapon balance thread. >:/
I got 0.2634
here, now stop talking about it in the weapon balance thread. >:/
I got 0.2634
--> -->
Reaction Time
|
09 Mar 11, 12:56AM
http://getyourwebsitehere.com/jswb/rttest01.html
here, now stop talking about it in the weapon balance thread. >:/ I got 0.2634
09 Mar 11, 01:17AM
0.312
09 Mar 11, 01:29AM
(09 Mar 11, 01:29AM)X-Ray_Dog Wrote: Checkmate Are you a robot? O.o
09 Mar 11, 01:39AM
no... he just used one of the dozen ways to cheat it... :)
09 Mar 11, 01:53AM
(This post was last modified: 09 Mar 11, 02:34AM by Ronald_Reagan.)
Which are *not prevented because its mostly a self test. Your really cheating on yourself :P
09 Mar 11, 02:02AM
09 Mar 11, 02:32AM
@ Ronald Reagan
You could not say better. :) @ X-Ray_Dog Sure... I used to blacklist "good mouse guys" like you. But this is another time. (09 Mar 11, 01:29AM)X-Ray_Dog Wrote: Checkmate Pfft... ![]() EDIT: Oh I just realised you could keep clicking until it turns green... If you do, you can get scores like this :L ![]()
09 Mar 11, 03:46AM
Ok so I know one way to play the game and its automatically cheating? Just because I know something you don't its cheating? I honestly had no program to do this, it was only me opening the above link and playing it normally. This is why I say its a stupid test. Ok fine this is how you beat the stupid test, It doesn't count false reactions so you can click as much as you want as fast as you want and it counts the first click from when it turns green. Happy? Good now stop trolling and find a better test. My real time was like 2.5 or something until I figured out I could do the above.
09 Mar 11, 03:59AM
09 Mar 11, 04:00AM
(09 Mar 11, 03:59AM)SKB Wrote:(09 Mar 11, 01:29AM)X-Ray_Dog Wrote: Checkmate He tried so hard to get this, it wasn't even funny. He was benchmarking different browsers.
09 Mar 11, 04:01AM
(09 Mar 11, 03:46AM)X-Ray_Dog Wrote: Good now stop trolling and find a better test. If you say so: http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbody/s...rsion5.swf better?
haha, fun fact: ff was fastest, chrome got 0.002, opera's best: 0.0024
Edit: oh, and i tried so hard to beat this, not to get it -.-
09 Mar 11, 04:04AM
Personally i would have just edited this in GIMP and said 0.000001 for every one.
09 Mar 11, 04:06AM
that is what i thought he did at first too.
09 Mar 11, 04:17AM
I don't like the sheep one, cause I press it when the sheep move their heads.
09 Mar 11, 04:35AM
So many ways to cheat them... I bet it is impossible to create anticheats to them all....
09 Mar 11, 04:43AM
wrong: you can stop people from cheating by not letting anyone play. Of course, this is like killing a man to stop him from starving. (as in self-defeating)
09 Mar 11, 07:04AM
09 Mar 11, 09:26AM
(09 Mar 11, 03:46AM)X-Ray_Dog Wrote: now stop trolling For future reference: Trolling often consists of using a program in a way it wasn't meant to be used, getting unlikely results, and showing off those results as though you got them by using the program correctly. Also, when someone calls you out on it and you get upset and refer to that as "trolling," you're trolling.
09 Mar 11, 11:58AM
yes. i got 9.0
go me.
09 Mar 11, 12:34PM
Lol noobs, try this one, http://www.humanbenchmark.com/tests/reac.../index.php
That is a proper one, you can't cheat that!
09 Mar 11, 06:39PM
Don't say "can't," people take that as a challenge! XD
09 Mar 11, 07:43PM
0.154 on sheeps
0.192 on HB |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|