Poll: Should spread be lower?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes, it's too high
41.67%
25 41.67%
No, it's fine
38.33%
23 38.33%
I'm not sure/ I don't care
20.00%
12 20.00%
Total 60 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Should spread be reduced?
#74
(19 Jan 12, 02:20AM)ParryHotter Wrote: ^ If godsmack is a good player in your opinion then i shall disregard any criticism you ever offer
You can disregard any criticism you want for all i care.

Im saying my opinion.
I have my right to do so.

Im saying that if spread are reduced and there is a "hitreg" fix too, the weapons need to looked at in every way.
After fixing hitreg bug and reducing spread we are facing a long time playing 1.1.0.4 before a new release will be ready.
This cos weapons need to looked at to get balance back to where it should be.

This is something devs can work with over time and release in "the big one", something like 2.0.0.0.

The game is playable as it is if they fix some small stuff like the shotgun thats overpowered when it comes to distance.
The "getting stuck" bug. Its real annoying.

Small stuff.
And still work on the other things but let them have time to do this.

You are all here talking about a big change to AC and before releasing something like that they (we - the players) need to make sure it works and keep this game as it is.

Arent we all playing this cos we like it?

Let big changes come over time so the game dont change from what we love to what we run away from.

(19 Jan 12, 02:31AM)|BC|Wolf Wrote: Who are you?
My thoughts also.
Thanks given by:


Messages In This Thread
Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 12:27AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Mystered - 15 Jan 12, 12:34AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 01:00AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MerCyKiL - 18 Jan 12, 06:15AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ExodusS - 15 Jan 12, 12:59AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 01:27AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Lantry - 15 Jan 12, 01:46AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Mael - 15 Jan 12, 02:00AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 02:09AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by bballn45 - 15 Jan 12, 02:16AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 15 Jan 12, 02:27AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 02:44AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MCS - 15 Jan 12, 03:22AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 03:43AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MCS - 15 Jan 12, 05:01PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 05:52PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MCS - 15 Jan 12, 08:37PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 04:03AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Habluka - 15 Jan 12, 03:49AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MykeGregory - 15 Jan 12, 11:36AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Joe Smith - 15 Jan 12, 12:43PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 02:40PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by tempest - 15 Jan 12, 02:44PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 03:04PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by titiPT - 15 Jan 12, 12:50PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by macm - 15 Jan 12, 03:10PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 15 Jan 12, 06:09PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Lantry - 15 Jan 12, 08:16PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Benson - 16 Jan 12, 08:51PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Mael - 15 Jan 12, 09:16PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by YourSister - 16 Jan 12, 07:25AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Stranz - 16 Jan 12, 08:29AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MCS - 16 Jan 12, 01:18PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Harps - 16 Jan 12, 05:33PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MCS - 16 Jan 12, 06:44PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 16 Jan 12, 11:23PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Cemer - 17 Jan 12, 01:55AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 16 Jan 12, 11:40PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by jamz - 17 Jan 12, 11:59PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Lantry - 18 Jan 12, 01:04AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by #M|A#Wolf - 17 Jan 12, 12:01AM
Script Create? - by Arnold*-* - 17 Jan 12, 12:26AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ElCrema - 18 Jan 12, 05:32AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by #M|A#Wolf - 18 Jan 12, 05:47AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 18 Jan 12, 06:36AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Lantry - 18 Jan 12, 10:38PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Jason - 18 Jan 12, 11:32PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 18 Jan 12, 11:59PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 18 Jan 12, 01:38PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MerCyKiL - 19 Jan 12, 01:29AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 01:51AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by OpenSource - 19 Jan 12, 01:58AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by jamz - 19 Jan 12, 02:38AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Orynge - 19 Jan 12, 02:00AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by OpenSource - 19 Jan 12, 02:06AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 19 Jan 12, 02:38AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by OpenSource - 19 Jan 12, 02:58AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 02:20AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by #M|A#Wolf - 19 Jan 12, 02:31AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 02:32AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 02:38AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Lantry - 19 Jan 12, 03:49AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by OpenSource - 19 Jan 12, 02:38AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 02:45AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 19 Jan 12, 03:13AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 03:17AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by #M|A#Wolf - 19 Jan 12, 03:45AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Undead - 19 Jan 12, 04:26AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Orynge - 19 Jan 12, 01:04PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 19 Jan 12, 03:51AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 04:25AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MykeGregory - 19 Jan 12, 12:17PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by tempest - 19 Jan 12, 12:31PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by 1ceMaster - 24 Jan 12, 11:56AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MykeGregory - 28 Jan 12, 11:25AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 08 Mar 12, 09:35PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Think3r - 08 Mar 12, 09:42PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 08 Mar 12, 09:43PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Think3r - 08 Mar 12, 10:00PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Mr.OpTic - 08 Mar 12, 10:10PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ExodusS - 09 Mar 12, 04:20AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 09 Mar 12, 11:25AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by kingCHUBBY - 09 Mar 12, 01:27PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 09 Mar 12, 01:43PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MerCyKiL - 09 Mar 12, 02:15AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 09 Mar 12, 03:32AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MerCyKiL - 09 Mar 12, 03:43AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ExodusS - 09 Mar 12, 02:57PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MerCyKiL - 09 Mar 12, 04:12PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ExodusS - 09 Mar 12, 05:46PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 09 Mar 12, 09:19PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Andrez - 09 Mar 12, 07:05PM