Posts: 992
Threads: 35
Joined: Mar 2011
Thanks: 2
Given 45 thank(s) in 19 post(s)
25/25
I'll do some more extensive testing.
it's fairly easy to detect, maybe because im using 1000 polling rate with the mouse and 120hz monitor. I know that 1000 polling "skips" but that's a detection i cannot make.
Posts: 971
Threads: 81
Joined: Dec 2010
Thanks: 161
Given 75 thank(s) in 55 post(s)
26 Jul 14, 08:46PM
(This post was last modified: 26 Jul 14, 08:49PM by 1Cap.)
50 ms
25/25
regular notebook
800 dpi mouse
win7
Posts: 1,212
Threads: 32
Joined: Nov 2011
Thanks: 87
Given 118 thank(s) in 54 post(s)
26 Jul 14, 09:46PM
(This post was last modified: 26 Jul 14, 11:08PM by Vanquish.)
Updating my results a bit:
50ms - 24/25
40ms - 25/25 (?)
25ms - 23/25
15ms - 19/25
10ms - 14/25
I guess 15ms or thereabouts is my threshold for spotting input lag.
Posts: 51
Threads: 1
Joined: Jun 2011
Thanks: 3
Given 2 thank(s) in 1 post(s)
50 ms: 25/25
20 ms: 23/25
15 ms: 17/25
10 ms: 14/25
5 ms: 9/25
Posts: 2,136
Threads: 50
Joined: Jun 2010
Thanks: 0
Given 7 thank(s) in 2 post(s)
50 ms: 25/25
20 ms: 21/25
15 ms: 23/25
10 ms: 25/25
5 ms: 13/25
Not long after starting 15ms, I noticed an easier way to spot it, but somewhere between 10 and 5ms is clearly my cut off. Can anyone explain what the practicalities of this are?
Posts: 1,212
Threads: 32
Joined: Nov 2011
Thanks: 87
Given 118 thank(s) in 54 post(s)
04 Aug 14, 04:59PM
(This post was last modified: 04 Aug 14, 05:00PM by Vanquish.)
I just thought it was an interesting test tbh. I guess it's useful in the sense that you can assess your sensitivity to input lag and delay/etc with a tangible statistic as opposed to just "feeling", but taking this test is somewhat redundant if you have a monitor/GPU/mouse with excessive input delay since the laggy feeling will be harder to detect than if you're using a 144hz/CRT monitor and a mouse with a high polling rate because of the intensity of the contrast between lag in milliseconds.
Your results are very impressive btw jamz.