Posts: 1,038
Threads: 96
Joined: Jun 2010
I'm attending a stupid C course at the university, and I need a C programming tool, that possibly highlights syntax and compiles without using external tools. Not Visual Studio, please.
Thanks.
Posts: 1,212
Threads: 32
Joined: Nov 2011
http://www.codeblocks.org/
If it's stupid, why are you attending it? :D
Posts: 1,038
Threads: 96
Joined: Jun 2010
(22 Mar 14, 01:34PM)Vanquish Wrote: http://www.codeblocks.org/
If it's stupid, why are you attending it? :D
Because it's needed to reach my academic degree. :/
By the way, it looks awesome, thanks mate. <3
Posts: 1,212
Threads: 32
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 51
Threads: 1
Joined: Jun 2011
http://www.bloodshed.net/devcpp.html
I'd say DevC++ is easier to operate.
Posts: 729
Threads: 16
Joined: Dec 2012
CodeBlocks is cool but some aspects of it are a pain if I remember correctly.
Posts: 999
Threads: 20
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 47
Threads: 1
Joined: Feb 2014
Yeah Andrez, try out Bloodshed DevC++ it is easiest IDE i've ever seen for programming on C/C++
Posts: 1,033
Threads: 85
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 964
Threads: 78
Joined: Dec 2010
Fast and easy:
http://www.bloodshed.net/devcpp.html
Less errors. Code Blocks
I prefer :- Borland C++ couse my aplications
Posts: 756
Threads: 53
Joined: Nov 2011
I thought DevCpp was abandoned.
Either way I switched to Code::Blocks long ago and haven't looked back.
You'll still need to install a compiler for your IDE (mentioning because you referenced "external tools") Code::Blocks has a version bundled with MinGW if you're on Windows.
Can't remember if it uses Mingw-Get, so you might want to get it manually if you want the most recent version.
Posts: 1,038
Threads: 96
Joined: Jun 2010
Hi guys, little update o/
Since I'm now running on Win 8.1, and the old version of DevC++ wasn't working anymore, I switched to Orwell's DevC++, which seems to be very advanced. I recommend it ;)
Posts: 533
Threads: 33
Joined: Jun 2010
Orwell's DevC++ is a fork of the old abandoned DevC++, so I can imagine that it's more advanced :D
Anyway, I love QtCreator. You don't need Qt (it's a framework like .NET) to develop with it.