(08 May 15, 11:35PM)X-Ray_Dog Wrote: People are always complaining about lack of democracy, particularly in stef's warning points run with everyone.no, people are just complaining about bad decisions being made.
(08 May 15, 11:35PM)X-Ray_Dog Wrote: Not many of you agree with his method of "taking out the trash" but he stands up for himself. And look, everyone freaks out every time he so much as does anything.really? i don't see anyone complaining with his (good) changes to the mapping system. people only freak out when he starts talking about things he has no idea about, like the competitive aspect of AC, among others.
(08 May 15, 11:35PM)X-Ray_Dog Wrote: That seems to be something I want to avoid but this thread will set a precedent for myself in the future when something like this arises again. If shit's going to go down, I want to make sure most of the people around here agree with the decision.so there we have it; whats most important is whether the decision is popular, not whether its correct i.e. mob rule.
(08 May 15, 11:35PM)X-Ray_Dog Wrote: This will be one of the very few "Democratic" options around when it comes to removing servers because I won't do this again.no, there is a very, very distinct difference between mob rule and democracy. you could make the argument that you're holding a referendum of sorts, but setting the necessary "yes" vote to 75% invalidates that argument.
(08 May 15, 05:25PM)1Cap Wrote: Of course is it, we all know...1Cap is on point for once.
Decisions taken in an emotional way. There is no analysis of numbers. A totally misplaced poll. 75%? Why not 50% +1? Why not 100%? or 80%?
(08 May 15, 11:35PM)X-Ray_Dog Wrote: It takes a lot of time and if I have support, then doing this will become easier.hello
(09 May 15, 01:35AM)Lozi* Wrote: ....don't make an inflammatory post like that and then demand people stay on topic lol