There are alot well-intentioned people. But many of them don't know how to help. And many of them are not understood.
...
Our attitude is to conclude on things. Our brain wants to rest. So the brain has to assemble the puzzle to understanding. Just closing the edges we can rest. We're used to it.
But it is not always possible to understand the whole concept with few facts presented. The case in question. We don't have the past, we don't know anything about the student, we don't know anything about the teacher ... Only commented that the professor is arrogant.
Arrogant is a defect? What does it mean to say that the professor is arrogant?
We must look beyond the subtext. Get a own vision of things.
Not to be swayed by opinions of others. Dont let yourself be carried away by situations and facts inconclusive.
However, some things are of collective knowledge. There are issues that have been treated several times and reached a consensus.
for example, the Nazis.
Racism. Pedophilia, etc.
We need to maintain a certain level of respect for other people. Otherwise we will return the atrocities of the past.
Observe that the tolerance level varies for each situation and place. Here on the Forum, for example, was said by moderators that they want a light level for posts, they don't want competition and spam.
Good, but we all have different personalities and cultures, and languages.
Certainly there should be a smart tolerance about it.
In the case of the story at the beginning of the thread, the professor and the student were intolerant with each other, in fact.
But, watch. The idiot never learns.
The smart learn from your own mistakes.
But the master, he learns from the mistakes of others and enjoy more the life.
Do you agree?
(edited) russian skills
...
Our attitude is to conclude on things. Our brain wants to rest. So the brain has to assemble the puzzle to understanding. Just closing the edges we can rest. We're used to it.
But it is not always possible to understand the whole concept with few facts presented. The case in question. We don't have the past, we don't know anything about the student, we don't know anything about the teacher ... Only commented that the professor is arrogant.
Arrogant is a defect? What does it mean to say that the professor is arrogant?
We must look beyond the subtext. Get a own vision of things.
Not to be swayed by opinions of others. Dont let yourself be carried away by situations and facts inconclusive.
However, some things are of collective knowledge. There are issues that have been treated several times and reached a consensus.
for example, the Nazis.
Racism. Pedophilia, etc.
We need to maintain a certain level of respect for other people. Otherwise we will return the atrocities of the past.
Observe that the tolerance level varies for each situation and place. Here on the Forum, for example, was said by moderators that they want a light level for posts, they don't want competition and spam.
Good, but we all have different personalities and cultures, and languages.
Certainly there should be a smart tolerance about it.
In the case of the story at the beginning of the thread, the professor and the student were intolerant with each other, in fact.
But, watch. The idiot never learns.
The smart learn from your own mistakes.
But the master, he learns from the mistakes of others and enjoy more the life.
Do you agree?
(edited) russian skills
![[+]](/images/collapse_collapsed.png "[+]")
Spoiler