(14 Jun 13, 06:04PM)-xW-#KrAyC3* Wrote:OMG sorry, I'm confused, I meant enslaved... I think he was the one using triggerbot versus Hosta, right? Say sorry to Swarmed from me, I always get confused with the names :3(14 Jun 13, 04:10PM)DamDam Wrote: In fact, you more often see non-cheating players try cheats (Swarmed, C3dric, Hosta...), rather than ex-cheaters cheat again. (exception for some guys like JV, S0NIC, Priest who will keep on cheating no matter what).Sorry Damdam, but Swarmed never cheated...
@Exoduss
I agree he should definitely receive a sanction, 3 months CBL'd is the least he should get. You can consider cheating as a lack of respect, even tho we all know it wasn't Hosta's intentions to disrespect the players & take advantage of the cheats. As he told us, it was "to try & for fun", which is a reason I could understand (not tolerate tho).
@titi
You get my point still, right?
I'm not saying we should not watch out for ex-cheaters, I'm just saying there are more newcomers that try hacks, than ex-cheaters who cheat again. Simply because ex-cheaters received a sanction that they (most of the time) care about and do not intend to do it again.
@Shadowz
Btw yes I still think rC is brought up in many topics when we never asked anything. Whether the discussion is about AR, scripts or cheaters, theres always someone (exo #1) to drag us into it... And it gets annoying that we have to constantly defend ourselves so.. yea, if we could avoid that happening again, it'd be great :)
@ZKarius & Shadz
I don't think Hosta wouldve admit he cheated if nobody caught him, i mean... it sounds pretty logic.
Whether he wouldve admitted or not doesn't change much, he cheated, he deserves 3 months blacklist; that's it.