(12 May 13, 04:56PM)DamDam Wrote: I'm sorry Luc@s, but the game isn't at his best either..Did i say it was at is best ? No.
(12 May 13, 04:56PM)DamDam Wrote: Some of the devs did not listen,Did not listen to WHAT
Every time the same thing, but never a solid proof of this being the general behavior.
If you think something was ignored, prove it.
(12 May 13, 04:56PM)DamDam Wrote: and again I don't understand why they complain and ban people who reproach them things they haven't done or shouldve done.Nobody did that.
Banning those who criticize, deleting posts or moving threads won't help on the fact that the game is on its downhill and will probably hit the bottom soon (if not hit already)
You're french, so you understood Edward's post. Full of insults. No constructive idea or argument. But we shouldn't ban maybe ?
Again, you won't have any proof showing that someone was unfairly banned just for "criticizing", if he were not flaming or violating the forum rules in any way.
We /all/ listen, we /all/ take the posts here in consideration, and we don't tolerate insults or flaming posts. That's all.
It's not because you're not able to understand what has been done that "nothing" has been done (regarding these particular points)
Also you should understand that we can't implement every feature before next release as it would delay it again more.
DOESNT MEAN WE ARE NOT WORKING ON THESE THINGS NOW THOUGH !
(12 May 13, 04:56PM)DamDam Wrote: One things is sure tho, without the community, the game never be able to bounce back and be active, interesting and fun to play again.One things is sure tho, without edward, the forums would surely become a more peaceful place.
(12 May 13, 04:56PM)DamDam Wrote: Instead of focusing on silencing those who complain, why not re-think the decisions that have been made and discuss it with the people who make this game alive?We're not silencing those who complain, again, you're being silly and that is seriously starting to hurt me. I don't fucking want to explain /again/ why a few guys were banned (seriously, who ??? 1cap ? edward ? Are you defending them ? If yes, you probably just don't remember or know all they did here. If you mean someone else, then who ? We're not silenting people, stop that bullshit !)
(12 May 13, 04:56PM)DamDam Wrote: As for the universal client, I fully agree with it, even tho the ACWC client was only used for a a short period of time as Lucas said; if we adopt the same system that Sauerbraten has, i can only see positive points.So for the moment, you could at least use the native binaries. I won't take GsF clients users as clean players as long as they refuse to use the official binaries.
Those who will not use this client won't be taken as clean players and will probably be out of the competitive system which will force everyone who wants to play the game seriously, to be 100% clean.
(12 May 13, 04:56PM)DamDam Wrote: If anything, I would love to have a customizable client. I'd find it pretty cool to have a client on which I could change fonts, stats on scoreboard, have geoip, change textbuffer & clockdisplay position etc etc...If you had made the effort to follow SVN's development, you would know that the scoreboard can now be customized.
What do you mean by "textbuffer".
And by the way, you can already change fonts.