19 Jan 11, 12:44AM
(18 Jan 11, 11:30PM)Roflcopter Wrote: I don't think it should matter who says an argument; rather the argument should be taken on its merits only.
Finally someone saying what has to be said.
Just to give my point of view about game balancing:
Dade Wrote:IMO, game balance it's all but not giving all weapons equal chances of kill. I believe each weapon should have it's own purpose.
Thus I am not a shotgun player, I would take it as an example (as most people are complaining with it). Shotguns are intended for close combat, if you face them in a short corridor you should have almost no chances to win, unless they miss the shot of course :P. I don't think shotgun players are any noobs at all, they still need to get near you for the frag, so your movement to void them is simple as walk forward.
Actually I don't think 1.1.0.4 is so badly balanced, I'm just seeing 'oldies' players wishing to have the game as it was time ago to continue leading as they have been done since 1.1. Which is both egoistic and shows 0 interest about the game itself. Sad...
GGz!