(23 Apr 13, 12:25AM)Andrez Wrote: Although RandumKiwi has an incredible ego and some kind of annoying behaviour sometimes, he really knows what he does.
Then could he explain himself on why he did that? Because it's not quite clear for most people considering Nightmare had the permissions to do it. Besides the fact that he did not appreciate things that were said in this thread, I can't really see a valid reason.
(23 Apr 13, 12:25AM)Andrez Wrote: Are you fucking serious? You are complaining about AC and the way it's made so much, that you're moving to Sauer, just because devs didn't even consider a tad of your suggestions?
People are moving to Sauer not only because devs don't consider their suggestions. They move because the game is more active, different, interesting, the community is nice, competitive aswell as pub scene are both fun to play and they don't feel like the game has been "stucked" for 2 years (ik devs are working, but the non-release is frustrating :/)
(23 Apr 13, 12:25AM)Andrez Wrote: What would AC become if EVERY SINGLE SUGGESTION would be taken into account?
Ofc taking every suggestion into account is not the solution, otherwise it'd be such a mess. But I believe some suggestions were great and lots of people thought the same, however, most of those ideas were rejected or not implemented for some (unknown?) reasons.
The main thing reproached to devs isn't that they're not working (because some obviously are), it's simply that they have a massive work, and seem not to want to share a part of their task when many people are ready to help. And then when people cry/whine about the late release, they respond that they "don't have enough people to fix bugs and help the release"... paradoxal uh?
(23 Apr 13, 12:25AM)Andrez Wrote: Do you even consider that devs do this FOR FREE? And they even have to listen all of your cryings and complainings?
Well when you develop a public game, you basically do it for those who play it. When you develop for free, the only difference is that the community shouldn't expect something from you, as you do it for free, you don't DUE anything because it is not a job. But when people from the community are ready to give their help & knowledge for free, to make the game better, why don't you accept it?
(23 Apr 13, 12:25AM)Andrez Wrote: Last, but not least, experienced moderators know what to do, and RK is one of them, so don't think of any kind of censorship or dictatorship, because this kind of behaviour is punished among moderators, no one is left out.
I'm not on the AC forums for very long, but correct me if i'm wrong; RK was active back in 1.0 version and was part of the dev team, during 1.1, i hardly ever heard about him being active on the AC forums but he's been back for like... 6 months?
Anyway, since he's back, i've notice that he has banned several persons everytime they would complain about something related to devs. Before he came back, I can not remember that many ban entries and not even a week after he came back active on the forums, he started the "stfu or ban" campaign.
I don't really appreciate the fact that some mods "allow themself" to remove, delete or silence what people want to say as soon as it's criticisms or remarks. If people who develop the game do not accept criticsm, advices or help... what are we left to?
Be quiet, and wait some more months sticking to AC ? People do not want that and it's basically the reason why people are leaving AC..
PS : Don't delete my post again Cleaner please :)