20 Sep 12, 09:48AM
(20 Sep 12, 03:57AM)Ronald_Reagan Wrote: I like scaffold more than shine :>It could also be "bad" pairing (complex vs shine, i'd pick complex any day), seeing how some of the maps were presented more frequently.
Perhaps shine is a bit overplayed?
(20 Sep 12, 08:35AM)jamz Wrote: I'm intrigued by desert, 2f2f, shine and complex having over 300 views each, while the others average 145, with σ~12. What made these four maps come up so much more often?There's nothing in computing that's random. So, some ranges/values get picked more frequently, as a side effect of an algorithm. For the next experiment one of the maps presented is not going to be randomised, or maybe not fully randomised. I still have no clue how I'll set it up, thus suggestions are welcome.