jamz,
Thank you for continuing to pursue this case.
It is true I have I played from the following aliases:
unarmed (For lack of a better alias)
wdad (For lack of a better alias, notice how these characters strongly correlated to the WASD keys)
Rajan
As for "made a note of the IP" and "Lo and behold it matched", this was perhaps under the same pretense as to my current accusation, i.e., being suspected of an aimbot. Now if you were to find that the player 'wdad' (me) was without a shadow of a doubt using an aimbot, then clearly it can be deduced that 'Rajan' (me) is also using an 'aimbot'. But herein lies the problem, the same person ('wdad', me) is suspected of an 'aimbot'. Unless there is a problem with using multiple aliases under the same IP, it is within my understanding that no 'crime' was conducted.
I do not recall ever being withdrawn from a game due to "suspicious client or suspicious activity". However, if you feel that this is a significant indication, I kindly request a time stamp along with server IP that this occurred.
Please excuse me if my interpretation of your second body paragraph is incorrect, but what I recovered from this is:
*My IP did not match within a reasonable ISP range for known cheats.
*There is a player named 'hilar' who has a supposedly wide ban-range in which my IP is caught under.
*Apparently I am within the same region (Northeast United States) as this aforementioned player.
*Mention about 'RoyceRK', supposedly another player believed to be 'hilar'. This is the most puzzling from your second paragraph. Is it not obvious that the player 'hilar' is 'RoyceRK' and therefore would clearly match in IP, geographic location, and time frame from playing with different aliases?
As for your final body paragraph:
*My shooting accuracy is odd to you, and your standard figure of 'aimbot' accuracy is 50%.
To what end do you not ban 'professional' players for their shooting accuracy?
Was the demo a mere object in an accusation based on flimsy deductions? That is, it seems your weighing fragile statements with more precedence than the demo (which is provided evidence) of my gameplay, which is odd to say the least.
Thank You,
Rajan
Thank you for continuing to pursue this case.
(05 Jun 12, 11:21PM)jamz Wrote: I saw a played called 'wdad' in a server log a couple of days ago and made a note of the IP. I can't remember now what it was, whether it was a suspicious client or suspicious activity; I just kept it in mind. When someone (haze, I think) pointed out in this game that they suspected an aimbot, the first thing I did was /whois Rajan and cross-reference the IP with my lists. Lo and behold it matched.
It is true I have I played from the following aliases:
unarmed (For lack of a better alias)
wdad (For lack of a better alias, notice how these characters strongly correlated to the WASD keys)
Rajan
As for "made a note of the IP" and "Lo and behold it matched", this was perhaps under the same pretense as to my current accusation, i.e., being suspected of an aimbot. Now if you were to find that the player 'wdad' (me) was without a shadow of a doubt using an aimbot, then clearly it can be deduced that 'Rajan' (me) is also using an 'aimbot'. But herein lies the problem, the same person ('wdad', me) is suspected of an 'aimbot'. Unless there is a problem with using multiple aliases under the same IP, it is within my understanding that no 'crime' was conducted.
I do not recall ever being withdrawn from a game due to "suspicious client or suspicious activity". However, if you feel that this is a significant indication, I kindly request a time stamp along with server IP that this occurred.
(05 Jun 12, 11:21PM)jamz Wrote: I checked the first couple of octets of the IP against known cheats; no matches. I then checked names used by that IP against known cheats and got a match; 'hilar'. The name created a ban entry for an IP range used by RoyceRK (If you don't know who RoyceRK is then you're avoiding the sort of websites I'd expect good, honest gamers to avoid), and it was just 13 minutes after this that the new IP showed in the logs.
So, I had two suspicious players using the same name on two different IPs, but both in the same geographic location and within 13 minutes of each other
Please excuse me if my interpretation of your second body paragraph is incorrect, but what I recovered from this is:
*My IP did not match within a reasonable ISP range for known cheats.
*There is a player named 'hilar' who has a supposedly wide ban-range in which my IP is caught under.
*Apparently I am within the same region (Northeast United States) as this aforementioned player.
*Mention about 'RoyceRK', supposedly another player believed to be 'hilar'. This is the most puzzling from your second paragraph. Is it not obvious that the player 'hilar' is 'RoyceRK' and therefore would clearly match in IP, geographic location, and time frame from playing with different aliases?
As for your final body paragraph:
*My shooting accuracy is odd to you, and your standard figure of 'aimbot' accuracy is 50%.
To what end do you not ban 'professional' players for their shooting accuracy?
Was the demo a mere object in an accusation based on flimsy deductions? That is, it seems your weighing fragile statements with more precedence than the demo (which is provided evidence) of my gameplay, which is odd to say the least.
Thank You,
Rajan