30 Apr 12, 08:09AM
For the most part, I think Ronald_Reagan hit it on the head. Not only did he give you a full, in depth review, but to actually review a map we need some sort of application from you. If you look in my original post, there is a link there for a submitting a map. We simply can't review every single map out there and for that we have to cut some out that could use our help. It's hard to decide which maps have a good mixture of good and bad items and have room for improvement. If you still wish for your map to be reviewed jg99, fill out the application, though I feel Ronald_Reagen gave a fair review.
On a different note, I would like to think Ronald_Reagen for taking the time to do a clean review like that. Good, solid, in depth reviews are hard to come by (thus is why Snoosnoo and myself do these reviews). So for doing that Ronald_Reagen (and well also), you have helped atleast one person out.
On a different note, I would like to think Ronald_Reagen for taking the time to do a clean review like that. Good, solid, in depth reviews are hard to come by (thus is why Snoosnoo and myself do these reviews). So for doing that Ronald_Reagen (and well also), you have helped atleast one person out.