04 Apr 12, 02:52PM
(04 Apr 12, 11:29AM)Undead Wrote:I think I was clear enough in the first post when I said that the game itself is not dead, but the community, the atmosphere around it is. You should know how much things were different before, and the game itself can't adapt to development, it doesn't breathe, it doesn't live, but devs must be adapted to what a new game should be. See, driAn left, Brahma came, now Brahma, wherever he is or whatever he's doing (real life comes first of course, nothing to complain here because he's just done just a perfect job) seems to be gone, so a dev should take all of this on his hands and keep this further and further. You're right though, players are still here, yes, PLAYERS.(03 Apr 12, 05:25PM)Andrez Wrote: AC is dead imho.
it is as alive as you want it to be.
everyone has their own preferred period of AC, but i enjoyed 0.93, enjoyed 1.0, and am enjoying 1.1. anyone who gives preference to one period over another couldn't adapt their play style to play as well as they could in the previous version, or was stuck in an immature rut(a prime example of this is drakas).
what has changed however is: the disappearance of key developers, leaving the development of the game stagnated because the people chosen to replace them simply do not care enough. i am sure they do care, but does a babysitter have the same care for a child as the parents?
however the players are still there in the game, and the players are still continuing to play matches, play tournaments, play pubs, make maps(well, not really), and the game is still going as well as its ever been, but by now i believe the game could have took a very sharp upward turn in popularity if it was developed further and directed properly. if you want AC to improve, and enter a new era, you'll need the devs to improve first.
Quote:p.s i really dislike you and people similar to you because you think retarded advice dog ripoffs are funny.Lol, would you explain what does this mean? I don't dislike you though, Chris :3