Should spread be reduced?

Home/News | Download | Pics/Flicks | Docs | Wiki | Forum | IRC | Discord | Community | The Team | Search

Hello There, Guest! Register

Poll: Should spread be lower? You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes, it's too high	41.67%	25	41.67%
No, it's fine	38.33%	23	38.33%
I'm not sure/ I don't care	20.00%	12	20.00%
Total		60 vote(s)	100%

* You voted for this item.

Should spread be reduced?

MerCyKiL Offline

Offline

Resident Noob

Posts: 762
Threads: 120
Joined: May 2011

#97

09 Mar 12, 02:15AM

Personally, I think that lowering the spread would be a good idea. In effect however, I think the recoil would need to go up. That way, game play would be more realistic for automatic weapons in the sense that your bullets would hit where you aim but "burst firing" would be used more to control the recoil.

Find

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 12:27AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Mystered - 15 Jan 12, 12:34AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 01:00AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MerCyKiL - 18 Jan 12, 06:15AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ExodusS - 15 Jan 12, 12:59AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Ronald_Reagan - 15 Jan 12, 01:02AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Felix-The-Ghost - 15 Jan 12, 01:22AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 01:27AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Lantry - 15 Jan 12, 01:46AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Felix-The-Ghost - 15 Jan 12, 01:32AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Ronald_Reagan - 15 Jan 12, 01:35AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Mael - 15 Jan 12, 02:00AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 02:09AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by bballn45 - 15 Jan 12, 02:16AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 15 Jan 12, 02:27AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 02:44AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Felix-The-Ghost - 15 Jan 12, 02:41AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Felix-The-Ghost - 15 Jan 12, 03:06AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MCS - 15 Jan 12, 03:22AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 03:43AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MCS - 15 Jan 12, 05:01PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 05:52PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MCS - 15 Jan 12, 08:37PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Ronald_Reagan - 15 Jan 12, 03:49AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 04:03AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Habluka - 15 Jan 12, 03:49AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MykeGregory - 15 Jan 12, 11:36AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Joe Smith - 15 Jan 12, 12:43PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 02:40PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by tempest - 15 Jan 12, 02:44PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 03:04PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by titiPT - 15 Jan 12, 12:50PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by macm - 15 Jan 12, 03:10PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 15 Jan 12, 06:09PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Lantry - 15 Jan 12, 08:16PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Benson - 16 Jan 12, 08:51PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Mael - 15 Jan 12, 09:16PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Felix-The-Ghost - 15 Jan 12, 10:28PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by YourSister - 16 Jan 12, 07:25AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Stranz - 16 Jan 12, 08:29AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MCS - 16 Jan 12, 01:18PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Harps - 16 Jan 12, 05:33PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MCS - 16 Jan 12, 06:44PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Ronald_Reagan - 16 Jan 12, 08:55PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 16 Jan 12, 11:23PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Cemer - 17 Jan 12, 01:55AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 16 Jan 12, 11:40PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by jamz - 17 Jan 12, 11:59PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Lantry - 18 Jan 12, 01:04AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Ronald_Reagan - 16 Jan 12, 11:52PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by #M|A#Wolf - 17 Jan 12, 12:01AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Ronald_Reagan - 17 Jan 12, 12:02AM

Script Create? - by Arnold*-* - 17 Jan 12, 12:26AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ElCrema - 18 Jan 12, 05:32AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by #M|A#Wolf - 18 Jan 12, 05:47AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 18 Jan 12, 06:36AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Lantry - 18 Jan 12, 10:38PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Jason - 18 Jan 12, 11:32PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 18 Jan 12, 11:59PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 18 Jan 12, 01:38PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MerCyKiL - 19 Jan 12, 01:29AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Felix-The-Ghost - 19 Jan 12, 01:27AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 01:51AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Ronald_Reagan - 19 Jan 12, 01:58AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by OpenSource - 19 Jan 12, 01:58AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by jamz - 19 Jan 12, 02:38AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Orynge - 19 Jan 12, 02:00AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Ronald_Reagan - 19 Jan 12, 02:01AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by OpenSource - 19 Jan 12, 02:06AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 19 Jan 12, 02:38AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by OpenSource - 19 Jan 12, 02:58AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 02:20AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by #M|A#Wolf - 19 Jan 12, 02:31AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 02:32AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 02:38AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Lantry - 19 Jan 12, 03:49AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by OpenSource - 19 Jan 12, 02:38AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 02:45AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 19 Jan 12, 03:13AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 03:17AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by #M|A#Wolf - 19 Jan 12, 03:45AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Undead - 19 Jan 12, 04:26AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Orynge - 19 Jan 12, 01:04PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 19 Jan 12, 03:51AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 04:25AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Felix-The-Ghost - 19 Jan 12, 05:13AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MykeGregory - 19 Jan 12, 12:17PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by tempest - 19 Jan 12, 12:31PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Ronald_Reagan - 20 Jan 12, 01:06AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by 1ceMaster - 24 Jan 12, 11:56AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MykeGregory - 28 Jan 12, 11:25AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 08 Mar 12, 09:35PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Think3r - 08 Mar 12, 09:42PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 08 Mar 12, 09:43PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Think3r - 08 Mar 12, 10:00PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Mr.OpTic - 08 Mar 12, 10:10PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ExodusS - 09 Mar 12, 04:20AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 09 Mar 12, 11:25AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by kingCHUBBY - 09 Mar 12, 01:27PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 09 Mar 12, 01:43PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MerCyKiL - 09 Mar 12, 02:15AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 09 Mar 12, 03:32AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MerCyKiL - 09 Mar 12, 03:43AM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ExodusS - 09 Mar 12, 02:57PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MerCyKiL - 09 Mar 12, 04:12PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ExodusS - 09 Mar 12, 05:46PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 09 Mar 12, 09:19PM

RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Andrez - 09 Mar 12, 07:05PM