10 Feb 12, 03:23AM
Sorry, my writing never survives first revision. Here is the first revision:
*I have seen config paths done all different ways. "./" is a fair standard for paths.
*There is no prescribed way to make configs. The way to write paths isn't standardized.
Ronald_Reagan Wrote:I have seen them all different ways. ./ is a fair standard for paths though.
*I have seen config paths done all different ways. "./" is a fair standard for paths.
(10 Feb 12, 01:18AM)Ronald_Reagan Wrote: There is no "real" way to make configs. [...] It isn't standardized.
*There is no prescribed way to make configs. The way to write paths isn't standardized.
Quote:or do you mean "real" way to make configs isn't standardized? I.E. There is no standard way of writing config files for AC^^ that