Poll: What type of FPS do you get?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
1-50
13.33%
6 13.33%
50-100
22.22%
10 22.22%
100-225
37.78%
17 37.78%
225-450
8.89%
4 8.89%
450+
17.78%
8 17.78%
Total 45 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Anyway to increase or stabilize FPS?
#5
MerCyKiL Wrote:So obviously I don't have a task manager.
Even if I didn't know this already

I don't think there is a /minfps...
I think I might stop posting in threads like this as I have little understanding/sympathy for people with 10+ times more FPS than I do :P

I wouldn't have maxfps set so high the computer can't handle it under varying conditions.

MerCyKiL Wrote:160-390 fps (with graphics set to lowest possible standards)
I think there's a large threshold in this statement to balance your enjoyment of the game's graphics with just how many frames (more than you can actually mentally comprehend) are drawn each and every second (poor computer)

Just an example of how silly hundreds of FPS is: Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 runs around 60FPS with fantastic graphics.

Mael Wrote:Also, everyone knows the human eye only sees 12fps jeez.
I get 20 FPS at most in AC and it's not quite visually fluid.
Related:<article>
Thanks given by:


Messages In This Thread
RE: Anyway to increase or stabilize FPS? - by Felix-The-Ghost - 21 Jan 12, 08:36AM