20 Jan 12, 03:54PM
I like the idea of updated blacklists. However I don't like a lot of what I see on this one.
189.156.52.210 // inapropriate name
That is what the nickname list is for. Someone shouldn't be blacklisted due to a bad nick, just list the nick. If they change their nick they are still blacklisted? Not good.
190.20.75.220 -- blacklisted with no reason given whatsoever. Not good.
184.4.116.29 //Gema Killer from jg99 11-14-2011
Gema is unsupported game type. Blacklisting ppl for violating user-made up rules for a game mode that technically doesn't even exist (its CTF) is shaky ground. I'm on the list for that myself and would appreciate being removed.
It also means anyone who uses your list but has 0 interest in Gema, will be banned from any server who chose to use your list. I'd suggest making a separate gema list. Or at least a subsection so non gema servers can remove the gema offender list.
189.156.52.210 // inapropriate name
That is what the nickname list is for. Someone shouldn't be blacklisted due to a bad nick, just list the nick. If they change their nick they are still blacklisted? Not good.
190.20.75.220 -- blacklisted with no reason given whatsoever. Not good.
184.4.116.29 //Gema Killer from jg99 11-14-2011
Gema is unsupported game type. Blacklisting ppl for violating user-made up rules for a game mode that technically doesn't even exist (its CTF) is shaky ground. I'm on the list for that myself and would appreciate being removed.
It also means anyone who uses your list but has 0 interest in Gema, will be banned from any server who chose to use your list. I'd suggest making a separate gema list. Or at least a subsection so non gema servers can remove the gema offender list.