Poll: Should spread be lower?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes, it's too high
41.67%
25 41.67%
No, it's fine
38.33%
23 38.33%
I'm not sure/ I don't care
20.00%
12 20.00%
Total 60 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Should spread be reduced?
#26
(15 Jan 12, 12:43PM)Joe Smith Wrote: when people say there would be more pros, if spread is lowered it doesnt just affect the better players it also affects everyone, so lowering the spread would just mean everyone would die quicker, both "pros" and "nonpros" so kills would go up but everyone's kills would go up not just a certain group of players.

It doesn't "just mean that". Consider if spread was completely random and aiming played no part. We'd all get the same results. As you lower spread you begin to distiguish players more. In fact very few people can actually aim well, many are currently riding on the fact they only need to aim close to enemies. Basically, the spray-and-pray bunch of players would decrease in skill.

(15 Jan 12, 12:43PM)Joe Smith Wrote: @ Roflcopter did you try burst firing ? when you shoot an assault rifle in real life, the spread ( if you havent mastered the gun ) is really worse than that.
So if players can get less spread than that cuz they learn to burst fire or do not spray then thats were skill comes in.

Of course I've tried burst-firing. Burst firing only help on the first three bullets which is not enough. And in SVN the first three bullets of an AR burst are even less accurate.

(15 Jan 12, 12:50PM)titiPT Wrote: Roflcopter, is there a way to compare the spread of the AR to the 1.0's with a picture like the one you posted?

I'm sure there would be for whoever can be bothered to do it but that's not me, sorry.
Thanks given by:


Messages In This Thread
Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 12:27AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Mystered - 15 Jan 12, 12:34AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 01:00AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MerCyKiL - 18 Jan 12, 06:15AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ExodusS - 15 Jan 12, 12:59AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 01:27AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Lantry - 15 Jan 12, 01:46AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Mael - 15 Jan 12, 02:00AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 02:09AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by bballn45 - 15 Jan 12, 02:16AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 15 Jan 12, 02:27AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 02:44AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MCS - 15 Jan 12, 03:22AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 03:43AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MCS - 15 Jan 12, 05:01PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 05:52PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MCS - 15 Jan 12, 08:37PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 04:03AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Habluka - 15 Jan 12, 03:49AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MykeGregory - 15 Jan 12, 11:36AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Joe Smith - 15 Jan 12, 12:43PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 02:40PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by tempest - 15 Jan 12, 02:44PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 15 Jan 12, 03:04PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by titiPT - 15 Jan 12, 12:50PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by macm - 15 Jan 12, 03:10PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 15 Jan 12, 06:09PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Lantry - 15 Jan 12, 08:16PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Benson - 16 Jan 12, 08:51PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Mael - 15 Jan 12, 09:16PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by YourSister - 16 Jan 12, 07:25AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Stranz - 16 Jan 12, 08:29AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MCS - 16 Jan 12, 01:18PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Harps - 16 Jan 12, 05:33PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MCS - 16 Jan 12, 06:44PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 16 Jan 12, 11:23PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Cemer - 17 Jan 12, 01:55AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 16 Jan 12, 11:40PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by jamz - 17 Jan 12, 11:59PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Lantry - 18 Jan 12, 01:04AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by #M|A#Wolf - 17 Jan 12, 12:01AM
Script Create? - by Arnold*-* - 17 Jan 12, 12:26AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ElCrema - 18 Jan 12, 05:32AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by #M|A#Wolf - 18 Jan 12, 05:47AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 18 Jan 12, 06:36AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Lantry - 18 Jan 12, 10:38PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Jason - 18 Jan 12, 11:32PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 18 Jan 12, 11:59PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 18 Jan 12, 01:38PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MerCyKiL - 19 Jan 12, 01:29AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 01:51AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by OpenSource - 19 Jan 12, 01:58AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by jamz - 19 Jan 12, 02:38AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Orynge - 19 Jan 12, 02:00AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by OpenSource - 19 Jan 12, 02:06AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 19 Jan 12, 02:38AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by OpenSource - 19 Jan 12, 02:58AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 02:20AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by #M|A#Wolf - 19 Jan 12, 02:31AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 02:32AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 02:38AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Lantry - 19 Jan 12, 03:49AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by OpenSource - 19 Jan 12, 02:38AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 02:45AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 19 Jan 12, 03:13AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 03:17AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by #M|A#Wolf - 19 Jan 12, 03:45AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Undead - 19 Jan 12, 04:26AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Orynge - 19 Jan 12, 01:04PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 19 Jan 12, 03:51AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ParryHotter - 19 Jan 12, 04:25AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MykeGregory - 19 Jan 12, 12:17PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by tempest - 19 Jan 12, 12:31PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by 1ceMaster - 24 Jan 12, 11:56AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MykeGregory - 28 Jan 12, 11:25AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 08 Mar 12, 09:35PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Think3r - 08 Mar 12, 09:42PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 08 Mar 12, 09:43PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Think3r - 08 Mar 12, 10:00PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Mr.OpTic - 08 Mar 12, 10:10PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ExodusS - 09 Mar 12, 04:20AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 09 Mar 12, 11:25AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by kingCHUBBY - 09 Mar 12, 01:27PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 09 Mar 12, 01:43PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MerCyKiL - 09 Mar 12, 02:15AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Nightmare - 09 Mar 12, 03:32AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MerCyKiL - 09 Mar 12, 03:43AM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ExodusS - 09 Mar 12, 02:57PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by MerCyKiL - 09 Mar 12, 04:12PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by ExodusS - 09 Mar 12, 05:46PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Roflcopter - 09 Mar 12, 09:19PM
RE: Should spread be reduced? - by Andrez - 09 Mar 12, 07:05PM