12 Oct 11, 07:06PM
not being biased or anything here, but snoosnoo is actually correct
meaning he isn't taking credit for the entire image, only stating it is a mod of an existing image done by makkE
now, on the other hand, he does need to give credit to makkE (i.e original (item being modified here) done by makkE, modification done by snoosnoo)
i'm sure if someone asked nicely he would put some licenses in there saying that the original work was done by makkE and that he only simply "modified" it
Quote:mod·i·fi·ca·tion (md-f-kshn)
n.
1. The act of modifying or the condition of being modified.
2. A result of modifying.
meaning he isn't taking credit for the entire image, only stating it is a mod of an existing image done by makkE
now, on the other hand, he does need to give credit to makkE (i.e original (item being modified here) done by makkE, modification done by snoosnoo)
i'm sure if someone asked nicely he would put some licenses in there saying that the original work was done by makkE and that he only simply "modified" it