29 Jul 11, 06:15AM
(29 Jul 11, 05:26AM)V-Man Wrote: To be honest, I did look at the site's source when I first registered. Maybe it's a script nerd thing.
Web security is a serious issue. I think Castiel deserves a severe reprimand and lecture about it. To answer Zarj's question, having access to the site while also being an ACWC player gives not an immediate advantage, but a subtle potential for abuse that could mushroom out later. It's not that Castiel shouldn't be trusted, it's that nobody should be put into both positions at the same time. It's the potential for abuse that worries Lucas, not any suspicion of abuse or intent to abuse.
At the same time, I do not believe Castiel should be banned from the ACWC or the website. This is a bit far. I believe that the punishment that (as Lucas said) is made necessary by the situation could be satisfied in the stern rebuke and lecture, and nothing more.
And that does not need to be public. This could have been best resolved through PMs, in my opinion, provided both parties can get on the same page. M__Stayla has the right idea.
Yeah I do that aswell, as I said it was stupid when I look back on it.
I pretty much agree with everything you've said. I'm not saying I didn't stuff up, I just don't think I should be made to sit the tournament out because of it. If he(lucas) wishes for me not to access the acwc site that is fine, I can have a teammate let me know what is going on.
I understand I have lost his trust which is fair enough, but expelling me from a large tournament as you said, should not be the answer/outcome.
Just an example:
Example Wrote:Lets say your manager gives you the code to your works safe as he is going on holidays for 2 days. You write it on a piece of paper so you remember it.
You then accidentally lose the piece of paper, but find it the next day on the floor at work.
Your manager gets back, and finds out what happens, he of course will check the contents of the safe and then change the code to ensure nothing is taken or stolen.
Now there is every chance he will sit you down and tell you the seriousness of what you have done and the risks involved, and probably not trust you with valuable data in the future.
But he isn't going to fire you for accidentally making a mistake.
This is essentially what I am trying to say.