18 Jul 11, 08:33PM
Okay Brahma point by point then if you can manage it ;)
I don’t want you to waffle on about some irrelevant bullshit Brahma, address the points or back up.
“Seriously, tipper... be less girlie. You talk and talk, rounding around arguments and mis-concepts, applying some logics* only when it is good for you.
*which you are not doing well...”
Yep I talk, cite me a “miss concept”, whatever that is.
The application of logic to suit ones argument is normal practice Brahma.
“I agree there are some relationship between statistics and girlie-wise. But it is far from 100% correlation as you suggest.”
Where did I suggest 100% correlation?
Cite me a mathematical proof that wasn’t constructed from the need to prove a supposition. There are some if my memory serves me but do you know which Brahma?
“You must remember that my main effort was to reduce speedhacking and aimbots... while, in majority, your feelings were about weapon and wall hackings. Obviously I tried to cover all fronts (not always 100% successful).”
I don’t know what your main effort was directed at Brahma so I’ll take your word for it.
It’s true that my main concern is about the discrete cheats such as assisted aim, reduced recoil, changes to hitbox, wall hacks and map overviews.
I appreciate your efforts to reduce the obvious cheats but that’s the problem Brahma, the players can discern the obvious cheats for themselves.
It’s the not so obvious cheats that are the problem; a problem which imo you had led this community to believe you could tackle.
Any fool can can rest a piece of wood on some bricks and call it a table Brahma.
“Let be sane... I believe you should apologize to Benson and recognize misbehaviors such as yours are poisonous to the game (or at least, weave better arguments, in the same level as tempest, zarj and others did).
Frankly I’m not that impressed with tempests level of argument (“newsflash”, threat, close thread) Is this the behavior you expect from your team Brahma?
Lets make no mistake here these guys are your choice to represent this game as mods.
Zarj did better, but he obviously has a great faith in statistics. Having spent many years as an engineer I appreciate their limitations.
I am quite sane Brahma. You can believe what you wish. It’s not going to happen.
It’s this I find fascinating. It seems you would prefer a happy clappy illusion that avoids any conflict of opinion rather than address reality.
So, I ask you, is calling someone a cheat more poisonous than cheating?
Players call other players cheats everyday in this game. Is there something special about Benson that I should know about?
Will you be banning everyone who calls out Hax or cheat in game in future?
A great many here I apparently don’t like or can’t handle any obvious conflict, I happen to think it’s healthy. It helps to demonstrate that the forum is open and free from excessive moderation.
Such conflicts go on within this community; they have and will as long as the community exists. It’s a perfectly natural process and one to be encouraged.
I don’t want you to waffle on about some irrelevant bullshit Brahma, address the points or back up.
“Seriously, tipper... be less girlie. You talk and talk, rounding around arguments and mis-concepts, applying some logics* only when it is good for you.
*which you are not doing well...”
Yep I talk, cite me a “miss concept”, whatever that is.
The application of logic to suit ones argument is normal practice Brahma.
“I agree there are some relationship between statistics and girlie-wise. But it is far from 100% correlation as you suggest.”
Where did I suggest 100% correlation?
Cite me a mathematical proof that wasn’t constructed from the need to prove a supposition. There are some if my memory serves me but do you know which Brahma?
“You must remember that my main effort was to reduce speedhacking and aimbots... while, in majority, your feelings were about weapon and wall hackings. Obviously I tried to cover all fronts (not always 100% successful).”
I don’t know what your main effort was directed at Brahma so I’ll take your word for it.
It’s true that my main concern is about the discrete cheats such as assisted aim, reduced recoil, changes to hitbox, wall hacks and map overviews.
I appreciate your efforts to reduce the obvious cheats but that’s the problem Brahma, the players can discern the obvious cheats for themselves.
It’s the not so obvious cheats that are the problem; a problem which imo you had led this community to believe you could tackle.
Any fool can can rest a piece of wood on some bricks and call it a table Brahma.
“Let be sane... I believe you should apologize to Benson and recognize misbehaviors such as yours are poisonous to the game (or at least, weave better arguments, in the same level as tempest, zarj and others did).
Frankly I’m not that impressed with tempests level of argument (“newsflash”, threat, close thread) Is this the behavior you expect from your team Brahma?
Lets make no mistake here these guys are your choice to represent this game as mods.
Zarj did better, but he obviously has a great faith in statistics. Having spent many years as an engineer I appreciate their limitations.
I am quite sane Brahma. You can believe what you wish. It’s not going to happen.
It’s this I find fascinating. It seems you would prefer a happy clappy illusion that avoids any conflict of opinion rather than address reality.
So, I ask you, is calling someone a cheat more poisonous than cheating?
Players call other players cheats everyday in this game. Is there something special about Benson that I should know about?
Will you be banning everyone who calls out Hax or cheat in game in future?
A great many here I apparently don’t like or can’t handle any obvious conflict, I happen to think it’s healthy. It helps to demonstrate that the forum is open and free from excessive moderation.
Such conflicts go on within this community; they have and will as long as the community exists. It’s a perfectly natural process and one to be encouraged.