Brahma, I guess I won't talk about the situation because you cannot agree with me and I cannot agree with you. However, I am not the one who brought your name up. Press Ctrl+F and write "Brahma". It's Crema who brought your name up first.
I do not see why you should give me warning points, especially that I did not insult anybody. Crema, on the other hand insulted my friend in a public forum and you did absolutely nothing against that, whereas when you were insulted by another member a few months ago you took every action to ban him. I don't see how that's being fair since I did not bring your name up and I did not insult a single person. I do not see the need to insult anybody to make my argument and I believe that other people shouldn't.
I am not disrespecting your name and I am not the one who used it, so why should I take the blame? I didn't use your name in an argument which contains insulting words. I will stress again, I did not start the "politics bullshit" in this thread, so treat the one who did with the penalty!
It's facts, experience, knowledge and personality that talk. Unfortunately, as far as I'm aware, the community has now partially split into those who are completely blind and those who are not blind and stick to scepticism. The former category comprises of people who are either completely conforming with Brahma all the time ("Brahma is ultimate authority"), or people who are completely against him ("Brahma is full of nonsense"). The latter goes more along the lines "I'll see for myself" or "I don't really care, I like playing this game more than anything".
Neither of this former behaviour is healthy for the game and the community. I'm afraid that during the past year the number of people who stay sceptic without leaning to the "nonsense" side has decreased and will continue to do so. This is not temporary damage, this is permanent damage that nobody can undo any more and for this reason a significant percentage of players will absolutely doubt the work you are producing, and will be producing, whether it produces absolutely accurate results or not.
I still want to stay in the sceptic side, but constant pressure from people telling you what to do in your house makes it seem like there are people who will do anything to achieve that.
Sure, I'll refuse to play with certain guys from a certain clan that's been accused of harbouring, but I will not go chasing, insulting and harassing them every day for what they, in my opinion, have done. And I won't give someone, like a leader, who keeps their share of scepticism a hard time because they have their right to come to their own conclusions.
I do not see why you should give me warning points, especially that I did not insult anybody. Crema, on the other hand insulted my friend in a public forum and you did absolutely nothing against that, whereas when you were insulted by another member a few months ago you took every action to ban him. I don't see how that's being fair since I did not bring your name up and I did not insult a single person. I do not see the need to insult anybody to make my argument and I believe that other people shouldn't.
I am not disrespecting your name and I am not the one who used it, so why should I take the blame? I didn't use your name in an argument which contains insulting words. I will stress again, I did not start the "politics bullshit" in this thread, so treat the one who did with the penalty!
It's facts, experience, knowledge and personality that talk. Unfortunately, as far as I'm aware, the community has now partially split into those who are completely blind and those who are not blind and stick to scepticism. The former category comprises of people who are either completely conforming with Brahma all the time ("Brahma is ultimate authority"), or people who are completely against him ("Brahma is full of nonsense"). The latter goes more along the lines "I'll see for myself" or "I don't really care, I like playing this game more than anything".
Neither of this former behaviour is healthy for the game and the community. I'm afraid that during the past year the number of people who stay sceptic without leaning to the "nonsense" side has decreased and will continue to do so. This is not temporary damage, this is permanent damage that nobody can undo any more and for this reason a significant percentage of players will absolutely doubt the work you are producing, and will be producing, whether it produces absolutely accurate results or not.
I still want to stay in the sceptic side, but constant pressure from people telling you what to do in your house makes it seem like there are people who will do anything to achieve that.
Sure, I'll refuse to play with certain guys from a certain clan that's been accused of harbouring, but I will not go chasing, insulting and harassing them every day for what they, in my opinion, have done. And I won't give someone, like a leader, who keeps their share of scepticism a hard time because they have their right to come to their own conclusions.