26 Feb 11, 02:39PM
(25 Feb 11, 01:43AM)Foo Wrote:(24 Feb 11, 10:57PM)|BC|Wolf Wrote: In my opinion, if there is an issue with a player from a specific clan;whether it is hack accusations/allegations, bad history from the player, etc., that player should be the one banned, not the rest of his clan mates. If you want to ban a clan's tag because it has/accepted a cheater, then please first make sure you only do it with absolute and clear proof that that player actually cheats.
let me run through a list here
Legacy accused of hacking:
Davitomon
Vault77
Sepehr
Legacy not accused of hacking:
Castiel
Larry
Jason
Foo
Vermi
yata
Xenon
Shorty(?)
In conclusion the tag ban is deserved only if you're a terrible server admin, and can't find the IP adresses, or ranges, of 3 players.
HOWEVER
If you truly want to tag ban us, we will keep on evading, keep on using our dynamic IP adresses, and keep on changing nicks.
Well...I´m sorry if someone get feels offended but this sounds a little childish...If you´re not wanted somewhere just go somplace else...not like there´s only one server right?
Regarding the bans for clan tags I think it´s not practical at all...like any other permanent ban...´cause the banned can always change ip, name or whatever and fair players can get in the middle. I always think twice and warn before banning players (except for cheaters) and they stay banned for an hour, but i never ban permanently. I even had a few cases of clan members (or some fu..er impersonating them) showing a really bad attitude and even insulting my country but it doesn´t mean I have to take it on the entire clan...I just banned the guy and if he wants to come back he´s welcome after an hour knowing that his behaviour will have to change to stay in...
In any case that´s my humble opinion.