The AC 1.1 cheat detection policy and the AC 1.0 cases
#69
(05 Oct 10, 03:49PM)Brahma Wrote: ...We did everything (possible and impossible) in a f*cking hurry to make it true before 2011.

If we had more trusted people testing, helping and giving (friendly) feedbacks, must probably we would not have so much post-release issues.

When, I talked to you a few months ago and voiced that in my opinion the release has come too earlier and a longer test period might have been better, I've got a diss at once. Well, it seems to me that I obtain descent approval now.

(05 Oct 10, 03:49PM)Brahma Wrote: The real supporters of this game were playing the trunk with the dev's, testing each change and proposition. Saying in the right time: "Hey! This change is a shit."

Well, if only critics are heared with interest when playing the trunk and only of well selected players ("the real supporters") - then it makes sense now, why several posts in the bug report threads have been skipped or commented boredly or irritably. On the other side it is normal then if several people have no interest in further reporting

Btw. have you ever noticed that you dividing willingly people in certain groups ("real supporters", "core elite") and these classifications are used in a positive-negative-distinction? This seems not very diplomatic. Just a hint.
Thanks given by:


Messages In This Thread
RE: The AC 1.1 cheat detection policy and the AC 1.0 cases - by Dark_Alex101 - 30 Sep 10, 02:05AM
RE: The AC 1.1 cheat detection policy and the AC 1.0 cases - by Apollo{TyD} - 05 Oct 10, 09:26PM