31 Jul 15, 08:47AM
@ironzorg the reason why we kept it close source during that time was to allow us to develop it with all the freedom we need and leaving all the options open in case people are not interested in this community. the rest is irrelevant. Maybe you don't understand why because you don't know how the development is working in AC (or i should say, not working).
What i want now, is to discuss, one by one, the features planned. Then, if my code appears to be good enough, we use it. Otherwise, we write it differently. Thats it.
Quote:who didn't compromise to help the project evolve (which they are willing to, as far as I know).And how do you know that ? Because, /afaik/, what i only got after 6 months from them was 1 positive vote here from XRD and a message from stef that says i can put some things on a separate branch. Thats all, after 6 months - but no discussion about the features, which indicates me if i make it open source it will remain sitting in its branch and never be used.
What i want now, is to discuss, one by one, the features planned. Then, if my code appears to be good enough, we use it. Otherwise, we write it differently. Thats it.