Well I made 3 threads.
- In the first one (that one) I was asking for small changes that would be easy to implement. I wasnt happy with the answers I received since the only dev who bothered to answer me was Lucas and he didnt say anything about weither or not the dev team would spend 10 minutes of their time doing it. So i just talked to him about that on teamspeak.
- He told me that he would implement many things if he could but all other devs had to agree. Problem was that some of them were not answering emails because of their inactivity and some of them were not very cooperative. So I came with the second thread, completely different, asking to remove the power decision of inactive devs blocking the update process.
- After the second thread and, I understood that lucas could do the change by himself but he was unsure to do it without the agreement of the full dev team. (By the full dev team you need to understand the inactive devs not answering, the devs who want changes and the devs who dont care or dont want changes). He didnt want to be kicked like stef was in the past because he did things without consulting the other devs. So here come my third thread, the goal being to convince Lucas to merge his very very hard work with a community vote. He spent much time doing it and I would like you to explain in the appropriate thread why you voted no. I would also like devs who are against to explain why but for now, none of them are against :)
- In the first one (that one) I was asking for small changes that would be easy to implement. I wasnt happy with the answers I received since the only dev who bothered to answer me was Lucas and he didnt say anything about weither or not the dev team would spend 10 minutes of their time doing it. So i just talked to him about that on teamspeak.
- He told me that he would implement many things if he could but all other devs had to agree. Problem was that some of them were not answering emails because of their inactivity and some of them were not very cooperative. So I came with the second thread, completely different, asking to remove the power decision of inactive devs blocking the update process.
- After the second thread and, I understood that lucas could do the change by himself but he was unsure to do it without the agreement of the full dev team. (By the full dev team you need to understand the inactive devs not answering, the devs who want changes and the devs who dont care or dont want changes). He didnt want to be kicked like stef was in the past because he did things without consulting the other devs. So here come my third thread, the goal being to convince Lucas to merge his very very hard work with a community vote. He spent much time doing it and I would like you to explain in the appropriate thread why you voted no. I would also like devs who are against to explain why but for now, none of them are against :)