28 May 15, 10:39AM
(28 May 15, 04:11AM)PhaNtom Wrote:I think the mods can sort it out for themselves, but there definitely needs to be a discussion rather than one person acting by themselves. There's no reason to stick to specific rules like 2/3.(28 May 15, 01:46AM)Marti Wrote: Get at least 2/3 mods to agree with someone being warned, so no one gets warned/banned for ridiculous reasons because one dev/mod doesn't like that person.
While I do partly agree with this, I think it's kind of bs for simple things like warning someone for quoting too many posts, and such things. I think it would be better of being something like needing 2-3 mods for agreement if the warning amount exceeds 20%
I do think that devs can have their say on how the forum is run.