So, that's it then, apparently.
#57
(25 May 15, 08:21PM)stef Wrote: Undead claimed, that acr is not illegal, when indeed it steals game media and uses it without permission (including media files from me, that's why I can be sure about it). And the "opinion", that it is okay to steal the media from a game is certainly not okay on the forum of said game.

no stef, i never claimed anything in particular from the outset (i know you like to automatically assume you know the answer before you speak); i was attempting to have a discussion with you so we could come to the logical conclusion of whether they were indeed breaking the law. as it turns out, it depends on the jurisdiction. i'm not going to bother arguing with you on that subject again because it is pointless, but the point i am trying to make is that you assume that you know more than you actually do.

(25 May 15, 05:02PM)stef Wrote: The law is clearly not your area if you can't understand

in that specific section of the law that we were speaking about (copyright law), i am actually well-read on that subject, unlike you.

(25 May 15, 05:02PM)stef Wrote: You should stick to stuff like your highly sophisticated "guide to mid skill".

what a surprise; stef has zero sense of humor. stef's internal monologue goes something like this: "if he trolls, he must be stupid!". that internal monologue is the mark of a complete idiot.

(25 May 15, 05:02PM)stef Wrote: And I "censored" your internet-folklore point-of-view, because a) it was completely wrong

stef; your stupid is showing. firstly, if you had any idea about the law, you'd realize that censoring something simply because it is "wrong" is false reasoning, and the underpinning arguments supporting censorship are never based around that precedent. the real reason you're censoring something is because you personally feel threatened by the revelation of that information. do you understand now, stef? this is what i have been trying to drill into your head for a very long time but it never quite seems to click. you're putting your ego where the law is; the law of the forum revolves around whether something offends you personally or not, not upon any objective standard of judgement to maintain order.

why do you really think i take the piss out of you on this forum? because there is no fair rules, there has never been, whether i get banned or not is simply based around whether i offend you or not. and in the case that i have to point this out (which i really hope that i don't), that is RIDICULOUS.

(25 May 15, 05:02PM)stef Wrote: Just to make that clear: what I tried to accomplish here, did actually work. After a long decline where the playerbase went from 300 online to 30 online and almost all contributors had left the game, the forum was slowly coming around. Insults and destructive behaviour on the forum were on a record-low, some small useful discussions emerged undisturbed - the need for moderation was actually declining. Also, my attempts to build up new testers began to work (of course not among the usual bigmouths... no surprise here) and several old and competent former contributors started showing interest in the game again. Things were looking good.

stef's delusional view of success, everyone. utterly, incomprehensibly, delusional.

furthermore, please stef. please AVOID talking about anything even vaguely related to the social sciences (politics, history, psychology, law, etc.), because you have absolutely NO IDEA what you are talking about. zero idea. none. please no more.


(26 May 15, 12:22AM)Mr.Floppy Wrote: Sad to see how the same few troublemakers that have been ruining the forum environment for years now finally have trolled away the last two active developers and still can't fricking understand that by now the game is dead indeed.

will you actually let me do something now? no, seriously, what the fuck? you barely have any active developers, the least you could do is let me do something to improve the game. unlike every other stupid bastard to run the game into the ground before, i actually know how to at least salvage some sort of upward direction from this mess of a game, even if our best chances have passed.
la chance, c’est comme le Tour de France. on l’attend longtemps et ça passe vite. quand le moment vient, faut sauter la barrière sans hésiter.
Thanks given by:


Messages In This Thread
So, that's it then, apparently. - by stef - 24 May 15, 09:48PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Harps - 24 May 15, 09:57PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Marti - 24 May 15, 11:11PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by 1Cap - 25 May 15, 01:53AM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Marti - 25 May 15, 11:57AM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by stef - 25 May 15, 05:02PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Harps - 25 May 15, 10:15PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by stef - 25 May 15, 11:28PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by stef - 25 May 15, 07:22PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by stef - 25 May 15, 08:21PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Undead - 26 May 15, 08:16AM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Alien - 25 May 15, 08:26PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Marti - 25 May 15, 09:45PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Harps - 25 May 15, 09:49PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Marti - 25 May 15, 10:10PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by stef - 25 May 15, 10:36PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Marti - 25 May 15, 10:41PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by 1Cap - 25 May 15, 10:47PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Alien - 25 May 15, 11:05PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Marti - 25 May 15, 11:10PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Cemer - 25 May 15, 11:54PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by stef - 26 May 15, 11:11AM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Cemer - 26 May 15, 12:15PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Luc@s - 26 May 15, 12:49PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by stef - 26 May 15, 01:27PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Alien - 26 May 15, 04:12PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Cemer - 26 May 15, 04:36PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by 1Cap - 26 May 15, 07:27PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Luc@s - 26 May 15, 07:30PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Luc@s - 26 May 15, 07:37PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Luc@s - 26 May 15, 07:43PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Alien - 26 May 15, 08:05PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by SKB - 26 May 15, 10:02PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by stef - 27 May 15, 01:40PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Cemer - 27 May 15, 01:52PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Harps - 27 May 15, 02:11PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Luc@s - 27 May 15, 06:21PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Luc@s - 27 May 15, 07:04PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by 1Cap - 27 May 15, 08:28PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Cemer - 27 May 15, 08:58PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Halte - 27 May 15, 11:37PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Marti - 27 May 15, 11:41PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Halte - 27 May 15, 11:51PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by stef - 28 May 15, 12:03AM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Cemer - 29 May 15, 12:36AM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Cemer - 29 May 15, 02:58AM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Cemer - 29 May 15, 03:53PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Luc@s - 29 May 15, 11:12AM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Luc@s - 29 May 15, 11:39AM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Alien - 29 May 15, 01:20PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by 1Cap - 29 May 15, 01:55PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Marti - 29 May 15, 04:04PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Luc@s - 29 May 15, 06:17PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Marti - 29 May 15, 06:25PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by al3rt - 30 May 15, 08:32PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Luc@s - 30 May 15, 08:44PM
RE: So, that's it then, apparently. - by Luc@s - 30 May 15, 09:36PM