30 Apr 15, 09:11PM
And all I am saying is that the statement has been made - if there are no gameplay affecting modifications, the maprot is varied, and there is no blinking in the server title, then it stands that a server is legitimate.
Unless there is significant community out-pour or a server promotes hate directly in some fashion.
Which is where an argument could be made - that enough people in the community can say that there is some direct abuse going on that warrants the server shouldn't be around.
But no - I fail to see the validity in claiming servers listed on the masterserver to be community property.
I do agree there should be a clearer set of standards in the matter, but I doubt that would even come to the satisfaction of all.
So my beef with your banter is simply that this is a truly fabricated concept that servers somehow 'belong' to the community.
As for the ping issue there are plenty of other servers available in the E.U.
Unless there is significant community out-pour or a server promotes hate directly in some fashion.
Which is where an argument could be made - that enough people in the community can say that there is some direct abuse going on that warrants the server shouldn't be around.
But no - I fail to see the validity in claiming servers listed on the masterserver to be community property.
I do agree there should be a clearer set of standards in the matter, but I doubt that would even come to the satisfaction of all.
So my beef with your banter is simply that this is a truly fabricated concept that servers somehow 'belong' to the community.
As for the ping issue there are plenty of other servers available in the E.U.