9th Endorsed Mapping Contest

[Undead]

But atm this argument has 0 substance .. Why dont you go ahead and propose one or two judging systems that you feel like are better and start a discussion instead of repating that fragile ego statement over and over

in my first post on this thread. nothing wrong with using the same argument twice if its appropriate either.

i offer a suggestion: instead of allocating 1/6th of the points for layout quality, why don't you allocate at least 1/2? i think it is better to encourage mappers to make enjoyable maps rather than pretty ones.

I care, but this is not the place. Make a thread like "9th Mapping Competition Discussion" and start quibbling there.

And yes, I use the word quibbling when it goes in circles and neither party will concede points, and therefore it is unlikely to reach a resolution.

Take this elsewhere.

well, if a resolution isn't possible, i'd like to make a final statement.

if halo doesn't want to fix this competition, i will not participate, and i would highly encourages others to follow suit, as there isn't any point in playing in a broken competition.