24 Nov 14, 06:52PM
(24 Nov 14, 06:48PM)Mousikos Wrote: As sarcastic as Stef's reply was, I actually agree with stef. anti-cheat is SUPPOSED to work like that. If you cheat, you're gone. No pause, no stop. You shouldn't break a function that does what it's supposed to (ban on cheat).
The only problem is, cheat detection isn't working properly.....
If they actually cheat then yes there shouldnt be a pause, but if you can read i said it hapens way too often that someone gets banned for 'cheating'.
The solution depends on what is done first, fix anticheat or implement pause function. If anticheat is fixed i also agree there shouldnt be a pause.