about AC
#1
hi everyone,
yes i still there (not happy? :D )
I am not there to speak about my ban, i will ignore every post about me if some peoples (who tell noob?) attack me.

I am there about something more important than my case.

Some AC player probably know that there is 2 versions, i want to speak about that:
in fact, i am really shocked than after some days, 2 AC exist. * I AM NOT telling to stop AC 1.0*
but, when i see a record of players on hi skill server yesterday, and saw than sauerbraten is more active than ac 1.1. So some peoples, devs first, could ask themselves if there is not a problem.

Some peoples probably think that in 1 month, it will be like players did from ac 0.93 to 1.0

In fact, it's too much different:
from ac 0.93 to ac 1.0, (it's may an error by me, but i thought it should already had something like an anticheat, because stuff aren't on client, but on server, or whatever)
so, from 0.93 to 1.0, every weapon get harder, and except the fact that the sniper's switch get kicked, and the ratio get added, and the "scoreboard" get changed (with 3 aren't really good stuff, because it changed *too much* from other version), the game was more harder, so people could progress. About AC 1.1, it could be like an AC 0.95.. the new weapon is so easy to get skilled almost perfectly, some newb will use it (because a newb like to think to be good after only 2 minutes on game), because it's REALLY easy to use, and people can't really progress. The recoil with the smg is down, wtf! Again, it's more easy to use.. about AR and sniper, i am not sad to them, because the AR sound nice (like people told me), and because the sniper is even harder, so it's nice. The shotgun is a bullshit, why a weapon with a crosshair could fucking gib. Another stuff, a really big bullshit, the nade. 1 nade, because a noob do some spam with nades on 1.0, and an uber noob cry about that, it goes down to only 1 nade.. What about gibs: (thanks god, not yet, headshots count for 2), but this, is really bad imo. This is, like if we play another game, not ac..
I think:
AC need more velocity, yes, it's too slow ffs!
It need to get harder weapon, i saw people on ql, or sauer, they are amazing. In fact, we suck (yes, WE, all AC): [check some ql games (-> youtube), and after see my demo, and tell me that human can't do what i did, some ql / sauer / and some other players to other game could do that with their foot..]
An AC player is a noob, it's a fact, because to be good at this game, it's really not hard, ac skills is really low, if we could make AC harder, it would be great.
My idea of ac: more velocity, weapon more harder, keep nade like 1.0 (and do it harder to use), stop score stuff (score in 1.1 or ratio in 1.0), and for me, just don't write who scored flag, but just put a flag for the team.

that's my point of view, it will probably won't be respected (i am almost sure, but if no one speak, it won't progress).
But, if we see what is happening in assault cube those days, devs, you could may think, and tell that there is a real problems.

i agree every point of view opposite to me if they are not arrogant, or don't do a flamewar.

i could answer to every question.

LiFe.

PS: that's of course my point of view.
Thanks given by:


Messages In This Thread
about AC - by LiFe. - 20 Sep 10, 10:01PM
RE: about AC - by Dreamer - 20 Sep 10, 10:09PM
RE: about AC - by Andrez - 20 Sep 10, 10:14PM
RE: about AC - by Gibstick - 20 Sep 10, 10:19PM
RE: about AC - by noerrorsfound - 20 Sep 10, 11:01PM
RE: about AC - by P@ndel - 20 Sep 10, 11:07PM
RE: about AC - by Ronald_Reagan - 21 Sep 10, 12:14AM
RE: about AC - by MorganKell - 21 Sep 10, 01:34AM
RE: about AC - by Gibstick - 21 Sep 10, 01:45AM
RE: about AC - by JMM - 21 Sep 10, 02:33AM
RE: about AC - by Ghost - 21 Sep 10, 02:44AM
RE: about AC - by KN!F3 - 21 Sep 10, 02:57AM
RE: about AC - by MorganKell - 21 Sep 10, 04:19AM
RE: about AC - by DogDancing - 21 Sep 10, 05:29AM
RE: about AC - by JMM - 21 Sep 10, 06:01AM
RE: about AC - by Habluka - 21 Sep 10, 06:11AM
RE: about AC - by LiFe. - 21 Sep 10, 06:23AM
RE: about AC - by Ghost - 22 Sep 10, 02:26AM
RE: about AC - by Undead - 21 Sep 10, 09:26AM
RE: about AC - by Bexlab - 21 Sep 10, 11:46AM
RE: about AC - by P@ndel - 21 Sep 10, 12:06PM
RE: about AC - by Bexlab - 21 Sep 10, 01:05PM
RE: about AC - by Stranz - 21 Sep 10, 01:47PM
RE: about AC - by titiPT - 21 Sep 10, 09:46PM
RE: about AC - by XFA - 22 Sep 10, 03:45AM
RE: about AC - by PrimeviL - 23 Sep 10, 09:18AM
RE: about AC - by Chill - 23 Sep 10, 11:24AM
RE: about AC - by Acropolips - 23 Sep 10, 11:41PM
RE: about AC - by P@ndel - 23 Sep 10, 11:48PM
RE: about AC - by Bukz - 24 Sep 10, 12:23AM
RE: about AC - by P@ndel - 24 Sep 10, 10:26AM
RE: about AC - by V-Man - 24 Sep 10, 06:36AM
RE: about AC - by Undead - 24 Sep 10, 08:57AM
RE: about AC - by JMM - 24 Sep 10, 09:35AM
RE: about AC - by Bukz - 24 Sep 10, 10:29AM
RE: about AC - by P@ndel - 24 Sep 10, 10:39AM
RE: about AC - by Bukz - 24 Sep 10, 10:41AM
RE: about AC - by P@ndel - 24 Sep 10, 10:43AM
RE: about AC - by Bukz - 24 Sep 10, 10:44AM
RE: about AC - by P@ndel - 24 Sep 10, 10:51AM
RE: about AC - by Bukz - 24 Sep 10, 10:52AM
RE: about AC - by tempest - 24 Sep 10, 01:57PM
RE: about AC - by Huntsman - 24 Sep 10, 03:47PM
RE: about AC - by P@ndel - 24 Sep 10, 03:49PM
RE: about AC - by JMM - 25 Sep 10, 12:04AM
RE: about AC - by Huntsman - 24 Sep 10, 11:55PM
RE: about AC - by Ronald_Reagan - 25 Sep 10, 12:18AM
RE: about AC - by JMM - 25 Sep 10, 12:31AM
RE: about AC - by MusicMan10 - 25 Sep 10, 12:37AM
RE: about AC - by #M|A#Wolf - 25 Sep 10, 03:13AM
RE: about AC - by titiPT - 25 Sep 10, 09:46AM
RE: about AC - by P@ndel - 25 Sep 10, 09:49AM
RE: about AC - by titiPT - 25 Sep 10, 12:25PM
RE: about AC - by pakit - 25 Sep 10, 02:48PM
RE: about AC - by P@ndel - 25 Sep 10, 03:27PM
RE: about AC - by Luc@s - 25 Sep 10, 02:52PM
RE: about AC - by Stranz - 25 Sep 10, 05:01PM
RE: about AC - by Kirin - 25 Sep 10, 09:35PM
RE: about AC - by P@ndel - 25 Sep 10, 10:55PM
RE: about AC - by titiPT - 25 Sep 10, 09:59PM
RE: about AC - by Bukz - 25 Sep 10, 11:04PM