Let me get this straight ...
There no wallhack because he knows, often where the enemy is?
You did not know he's using "no-recoil". Is it?
"if" is as no-recoil, you think that does not change the result?
Accuracy less than or equal to 30% means - no cheater?
Your review would be?
1) He is not cheater
2) I could not determine
3) He is not cheater for sure
* Accuracy does not determine hitbox ... or aimbot, right? | These cheats can be activated or not during the game ...
I saw other demos where you reporting cheaters. I'm trying to understand where they were 150% sure ...
Thanks for the feedback.
...
There no wallhack because he knows, often where the enemy is?
You did not know he's using "no-recoil". Is it?
"if" is as no-recoil, you think that does not change the result?
Accuracy less than or equal to 30% means - no cheater?
Your review would be?
1) He is not cheater
2) I could not determine
3) He is not cheater for sure
* Accuracy does not determine hitbox ... or aimbot, right? | These cheats can be activated or not during the game ...
I saw other demos where you reporting cheaters. I'm trying to understand where they were 150% sure ...
Thanks for the feedback.
...
(22 Nov 13, 11:51AM)jamz Wrote: OK, I've watched it (thank you, Medusa).
There's no wallhack. There are plenty of times when he has no idea where the opposition players are. As for no-recoil (lift, not kickback), if that's true it doesn't help his accuracy much. Discounting rifle sprinting and the odd spawn-shot (I counted 112 wasted bullets in total) his accuracy is just under 30%.
Nothing to see here.