10 Sep 10, 07:44PM
I don't understand why you still refuse to read, or understand, what i am writing here.
Everyone seems to make a point on the anti cheat when it comes to the differences between 1.0 and 1.1 versions. Guys!!! IT IS OKAY WITH THE ANTI-CHEAT! But new weapon, lots of pick ups, weapon balance (you say it did not change, well, surprise, it did and even DEVs said that in one of their posts) ... This is screwing up the game.
Also, a game like AC, an open source game made and played without paying anything for it, must not change so drastically! Why is that every new version of AC must be a new game? It is not COD which MUST bring something COMPLETELY NEW with each NEW GAME they release because it is made for attracting more players to earn more money! Since when did AC become a paid-to-play game that it has the luxury of having so many "revolutions" in its game play? Maybe dev's are not quite sure about the game? Too many opinions? What is it? When will we, finally, have a stable AC version? When will we stop introducing new changes to the game play? You really cannot blame people for resisting against changes if every version was something new with new features and a new game play. Who wants a game that is so chaotic? Seriously...
P@ndel
Quote:why not implement all these feature, although they are not perfect, to 1.0 without screwing the game play with an extra weapon, extra armor which has made 1.1 a pick-up game?
Everyone seems to make a point on the anti cheat when it comes to the differences between 1.0 and 1.1 versions. Guys!!! IT IS OKAY WITH THE ANTI-CHEAT! But new weapon, lots of pick ups, weapon balance (you say it did not change, well, surprise, it did and even DEVs said that in one of their posts) ... This is screwing up the game.
Also, a game like AC, an open source game made and played without paying anything for it, must not change so drastically! Why is that every new version of AC must be a new game? It is not COD which MUST bring something COMPLETELY NEW with each NEW GAME they release because it is made for attracting more players to earn more money! Since when did AC become a paid-to-play game that it has the luxury of having so many "revolutions" in its game play? Maybe dev's are not quite sure about the game? Too many opinions? What is it? When will we, finally, have a stable AC version? When will we stop introducing new changes to the game play? You really cannot blame people for resisting against changes if every version was something new with new features and a new game play. Who wants a game that is so chaotic? Seriously...
P@ndel