10 Sep 10, 06:46PM
I don't need to know about you tipper, no offense, nor about the game. I got a "simple stuff", as you use to say: 1.0 and 1.1 versions. 1.1 is a new game. And many people cannot get used to the new 1.1 (no, i am not talking about myself; I have 1.1 installed but i didn't spend any of my time trying to figure out new tactics for it, nor getting used to the new game play, but i played it enough to understand and come to a solid conclusion that is it nowhere close to 1.0 when it comes to its game play). This does not require me to know the history of the game. I look at what the two versions are, and what some well-knows AC players have to say about it. That is the foundation of my argument. If you still think i am not being serious, well, please don't try to explain me anything then, and quit replying me.
I asked to the DEVs a number of simple questions about 1.1 and 1.0. As a reply, i got banned from the forums. Why? Is it so hard to answer a number of simple questions? No. Everyone knows that the new versions has many problems. Let it the the anti-cheat, which some people still think is perfect and are ready to ban from AC forums everyone who thinks the opposite, etc. I ask it again, why not implement all these feature, although they are not perfect, to 1.0 without screwing the game play with an extra weapon, extra armor which has made 1.1 a pick-up game?
Thats all...
P@ndel
I asked to the DEVs a number of simple questions about 1.1 and 1.0. As a reply, i got banned from the forums. Why? Is it so hard to answer a number of simple questions? No. Everyone knows that the new versions has many problems. Let it the the anti-cheat, which some people still think is perfect and are ready to ban from AC forums everyone who thinks the opposite, etc. I ask it again, why not implement all these feature, although they are not perfect, to 1.0 without screwing the game play with an extra weapon, extra armor which has made 1.1 a pick-up game?
Thats all...
P@ndel