(15 Sep 13, 10:00PM)Andrez Wrote: 1) It is no secret that Petrol:USA=USA:Petrol for ages, so yes, they fucking invade everything that contains petrol.
...
And don't tell me USA isn't invasive, after this.
I don't deny that the USA is invasive, and never have. I really don't care if you've participated in some superficial protest, you need to consider the wider picture. Every country seeks to extend their sphere of influence in one way or another if possible. This especially applies to the United States.
However,
(15 Sep 13, 10:00PM)Andrez Wrote: 1) It is no secret that Petrol:USA=USA:Petrol for ages, so yes, they fucking invade everything that contains petrol.
As i said before, i'm still awaiting proof that the Obama administration's stance on Syria is entirely concerned with oil profits and funding of the weapons industry. The Bush administration is a different story altogether, and i agree with that, but there has been change within the American government and the attitude of the American people towards unnecessary conflict.
I don't understand how you can lack understanding in the way power works when you've held positions of power before.
(15 Sep 13, 10:00PM)Andrez Wrote: 2) I'm no Islamophobe or however it's called, I don't give a shit of anyone. But seriously, how hard is to notice that Islam-based countries are those ones where repression and dictatorship are radical and omnipresent?
Do you know what is the Arab Spring? And don't you know that top causes for this are human rights violations and corruption above all? How many of them aren't Islam-based?
3) Although US presidents and Islam are not the main causes of this world being total shit, I don't see how both of these have done something good so far.
The causes of the Arab Spring aren't Islamic-based, they're based off the political, social, and cultural conditions present in the country. Like in Libya's case, the corruption and the tyranny of a dictatorship.
Absolutely nothing to do with Islam.
People are unhappy with the current state of their society, it interferes with their quality of life, so they revolt. This pattern isn't just limited to countries with an Islamic majority. How the hell do you go from human-rights violations and corruption and relate it to Islam? Does this mean that my boy Berlusconi is an Imam?
For someone who i assume has completed their high school education, i would assume you know the difference between correlation and causation. It doesn't seem like you do.
You've completely missed all the points in my posts, probably because you can't be bothered applying your English skills, so let me outline what you need to do to understand what i'm trying to say.
Firstly, re-read my post.
Very carefully.
Don't automatically assume i'm an idiot before you read my post.
You need to look at it objectively.
It thoroughly breaks down the logical faults within your arguments and rhetoric.
There isn't any point in continuing this argument until you do so.
Secondly, you're just making yourself look like a massive idiot. This isn't meant to be personal, your posts just give off completely uneducated and retarded viewpoints that aren't considerate of anyone else's.
Thirdly, whoever insults the most doesn't automatically win an argument. You need to have some kind of logical basis to your arguments. It feels like you came to your conclusions through emotion not reason. There is little point holding an argument with someone who came to their conclusions via emotion, unless it is to prove a point to other people.
Lastly, if you are of substandard intelligent you should not hold a moderator position or any position of similar responsibility. I'd also advise you to keep your mouth shut tight, or else you'll make a fool out of yourself.
I doubt there is anyone to back you up against that presumption.
(15 Sep 13, 10:00PM)Andrez Wrote: 4) You're quite annoying to be honest, you can use leeeessss words to describe it. Using much words doesn't make you look smarter. Fag.
(15 Sep 13, 10:00PM)Andrez Wrote: I don't give a shit of anyone
I believe a man's words are reflective of his intelligence.
Andrez, ladies and gents.