(12 Sep 13, 09:53PM)Andrez Wrote:(12 Sep 13, 06:51AM)Undead Wrote: Half the comments on this thread seem like they've been reading retarded /r/worldnews comments and basing one-dimensional opinions off them.You may have been reading the wrong news, boy. You actually made a copy/paste of some kind of bullshit written somewhere. Some of them may be right, but this doesn't mean mine are wrong, read again, fucktard.
Just because i'm able to compose a coherent argument doesn't mean i copy/pasted "some kind of bullshit". Perhaps you think i'm plagiarizing because i'm using capitals? The only reason i'm using formal grammar is because it is more appropriate for a conducive discussion.
If you're doubting that the comments in this thread aren't just as fucking stupid as the lower-spectrum of reddit comments i invite you to head over to that website and analyze the comments made. Only if you're capable of doing so.
Since i feel the need to make the world aware of your stupidity, and i have the time, i'll address your views on the Syrian conflict.
(11 Sep 13, 04:23PM)Andrez Wrote: Obama, like any other 'average' USA president so far, is going to do everything to move towards a war and therefore invade anything.
First of all, it is extremely childish to assume that the motive of every US president is to "invade anything" and continue war. You're presenting him in your poorly thought out argument as exactly the same as every other president without any evidence or proof-of-concept. You act as if every president in the history of the United States who did not fit your definition of "extraordinary" as exactly the same as Bush.
Obama may have ulterior motives, such as the continuing of the war to sell weapons or the installation of a pro-USA government to sell off oil, but as far as i'm concerned, unless something can evidence this its just conspiritard talk. I'm sure there is something to evidence this, and if someone here can produce an argument for it (not likely) i'd love to hear it.
(11 Sep 13, 04:23PM)Andrez Wrote: So yeah, I would just let Syria destroy its fucking ass off with no external intervention and let the rest of the world live in peace.
So if you were the president of the United States, you would gladly allow the proliferation of chemical weapons in Syria, thereby setting a precedent for the use in other conflicts (possibly a future one in your home country?), a massive refugee crisis causing the suffering of millions of people, the unrestricted spreading of the conflict into other neighboring nations such as Turkey, Jordan, Lebanon, Iraq, and even Israel, and allow Russia, who would be glad to take over the United States' hegemony in the Middle East, to support repressive dictatorships such as the Assad regime, causing untold sufferings and even more future conflicts
You're a fucking psychopath.
(11 Sep 13, 04:23PM)Andrez Wrote: Seriously, Middle East has always been called the terrorist, but fuck that, US sucks even more. If ME wouldn't exist at all and US presidents were not so faggot, imagine what a peaceful world.
You're actually serious?
Conflicts of differing nature persist through South America, Asia and Africa. Africa is in a position far more dire than the Middle East and needing far more humanitarian aide.
Of course, all suffering in the world is down to those faggot US presidents and Islam existing. Not only are you a fucking retard, you're also an islamophobe.