9/11: your opinions
#9
For those who are skeptic about this whole stuff, I want you show you a list of things:

1) According to an accident happened at the Empire State Building many years ago, which involved a plane crashing into the skyscraper, WTC were thought to be totally indestructible, especially in case of plane crashing. Planes can never ever crash into a steel structure, it should have blown up, leaving the building totally intact.

2) Collapse of the buildings was supposed to be caused by molten steel, that weakened the whole structure. The problem is that steel melts at about 1600 degrees, and the planes' fuel was not hot enough, not even close to about 900 degrees. Also, nanothermite was found in Ground Zero, which is responsible for overheating and therefore melting steel.

3) USA is known to be the safest force in the world. Anyway, (unexpert) terrorists were able to hijack four planes in one day, and piloting 2 of them with extreme precision to Twin Towers. Also, when a trasponder is turned off, there are several procedures that don't allow such consequences to happen.

4) For some unexplained reason, whereas human bodies and flesh were found in Ground Zero, only some little pieces of the Boeing's were found. Not even the engines and the black boxes were found, which are things that are always found after a plane accident.

5) Major news reporters (CNN, NBC, ABC...) had a mysterious blackout during the second plane crash, and for some reason, local TV's were unable to air.

6) According to point 5, many TV and 'amateur' footages appearead to be fakes, due to wrong light/angles, planes trajectories, and planes/towers sizes wrong ratio, even in the distance. Also, it seems that most of amateur footages are actually made by professionists, and still showing different details each other.

7) There seem to be some last calls from planes' passengers to their families and such, before crashing. The problem is that for technical reasons, those calls couldn't ever be done.

8) WTC-7 collapsed too that day. The problem is that it had no reason at all to collapse, since it wasn't hit by anything, and WTC debris weren't powerful enough to cause such damage. Also, like Twin Towers, it seemed to be a controlled explosion, due to some 'squibs' (slang term used to describe that explosive smoke coming out of the building in such cases) seen during the collapse.

9) The Pentagon was hit too the same day, and by a plane too. But...
1) None of the 80 surveillance cameras recorded a plane crashing...
2) ...and only a footage, by a close hotel, was released, but it still doesn't show any plane, only an explosion.
3) The Pentagon is known to be the safest structure of the Earth, but the "plane" reached the third ring of the structure.
4) Also, none of the "holes" caused by the "plane" seems to be the same size to something like a plane...
5) And for some weird reason, although the wall was destroyed, some windows' glass was still intact. Anything that could be led to a controlled explosion...
Thanks given by:


Messages In This Thread
9/11: your opinions - by Andrez - 21 Jul 13, 02:48PM
RE: 9/11: your opinions - by DrauL - 21 Jul 13, 02:56PM
RE: 9/11: your opinions - by Vermi - 21 Jul 13, 03:01PM
RE: 9/11: your opinions - by Marti - 21 Jul 13, 03:01PM
RE: 9/11: your opinions - by Luc@s - 21 Jul 13, 03:26PM
RE: 9/11: your opinions - by Oracle - 21 Jul 13, 03:44PM
RE: 9/11: your opinions - by ExodusS - 21 Jul 13, 04:29PM
RE: 9/11: your opinions - by Nightmare - 21 Jul 13, 05:18PM
RE: 9/11: your opinions - by Andrez - 21 Jul 13, 05:20PM
RE: 9/11: your opinions - by MykeGregory - 21 Jul 13, 05:51PM
RE: 9/11: your opinions - by Luc@s - 21 Jul 13, 06:37PM