General behaviour and shit

[Luc@s]

Then could he explain himself on why he did that? Because it's not quite clear for most people considering Nightmare had the permissions to do it. Besides the fact that he did not appreciate things that were said in this thread, I can't really see a valid reason.

Here is the reason : the thread went quickly into a flamewar. Also, iirc, Nightmare wasn't given the permission to make this thread.

People are moving to Sauer not only because devs don't consider their suggestions. They move because the game is more active, different, interesting, the community is nice, competitive aswell as pub scene are both fun to play and they don't feel like the game has been "stucked" for 2 years (ik devs are working, but the non-release is frustrating :/)

I find your remark pretty funny actually. Sauer is worse then AC on many points; Despite an impressive set of "official" maps, only a few are played (and they're played all the time).
It's seems very hard to play something else than insta ctf / regen capture.
Teamkilling a serious issue in this game. Most often you can even kick. On some servers you have to auth and do a report....
On AC, if a tker wasn't kicked by the autokick/friendly fire check system, you can still kick him manually.

Ofc taking every suggestion into account is not the solution, otherwise it'd be such a mess. But I believe some suggestions were great and lots of people thought the same, however, most of those ideas were rejected or not implemented for some (unknown?) reasons.

Which ones ? Your posts lacks of examples.

[The devs] seem not to want to share a part of their task when many people are ready to help. And then when people cry/whine about the late release, they respond that they "don't have enough people to fix bugs and help the release"... paradoxal uh?

Wrong. We were offered some help for a few new possible features only and it is very recent. I'm not trying to minimize what some did, ofc.

Well when you develop a public game, you basically do it for those who play it.

I don't want to go into this debate, but clearly, no.

But when people from the community are ready to give their help & knowledge for free, to make the game better, why don't you accept it?

What the hell ? We're accepting it ...

I'm not on the AC forums for very long, but correct me if i'm wrong; RK was active back in 1.0 version and was part of the dev team, during 1.1, i hardly ever heard about him being active on the AC forums but he's been back for like... 6 months?
Anyway, since he's back, i've notice that he has banned several persons everytime they would complain about something related to devs. Before he came back, I can not remember that many ban entries and not even a week after he came back active on the forums, he started the "stfu or ban" campaign.

Correlation doesn't imply causation. A few members of the forums were spreading bullshit and being very offensive recently. They were banned for these reasons. I know people tend to forgot the reasons fast, but they are valid.

I don't really appreciate the fact that some mods "allow themself" to remove, delete or silence what people want to say as soon as it's criticisms or remarks. If people who develop the game do not accept criticsm, advices or help... what are we left to?
Be quiet, and wait some more months sticking to AC ? People do not want that and it's basically the reason why people are leaving AC..

That's silly. We accept criticisms. We don't accept /offensive/ criticisms.