(19 Apr 13, 09:56PM)ElCrema Wrote: The scenario or circumstances will ALWAYS be irrelevant, no exceptions should ever be made when it comes to someone's right to due process.In my opinion circumstances are always relevant. I have my doubts that say your family and friends were kidnapped and placed in a hidden basement somewhere with a timer bomb, and you had the chance to torture the person that did it for information, you would hesitate from doing so because you wouldn't want to defile his civil/human rights. It's just an example but really I think that circumstances are everything in these types of situations. I doubt that most governments would reject the idea of torturing a terrorist for information when it came down to a severe case of national security. Many laws around the world exist to prevent torture but in reality it's happened countless of the times under the radar.
Poll: Would you torture a terrorist to save 1,000 lives? You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
No | 11 | 23.91% | |
Yes, if it saved lives | 23 | 50.00% | |
Yes, I would anyway | 12 | 26.09% | |
Total | 46 vote(s) | 100% |
* You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
Would you torture a terrorist to save 1,000 lives?
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|