Poll: More or less official maps?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
More
76.09%
70 76.09%
Less
23.91%
22 23.91%
Total 92 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

More official maps, or less official maps?
#32
(15 Sep 12, 10:51AM)Xenon Wrote: maps to be added:
wasteland

get rid of:
keller
toxic

I know your going to say, blah blah blah but quality>quantity. Toxic, Keller are great maps but no-one plays them, it's a waste of space in the game, which maps like terros can take it's place.
I've played keller and toxic plenty on pubs in my time zone. Sure they're meh in clan matches, but people do play them. In the next version something has to be done with armour saturation in toxic, though, 2 vests and 3 helmets! Both maps are top 15 (out of 63) in the popularity experiment, by the way. (toxic: 10, keller 15)

Looking at the popularity thing (I'll announce full results later) people seem to dislike snow. How is wasteland better than snow?

Also, the biggest space eaters are models and textures - not maps themselves. I'd rather have decent maps played seldom, than see 'missing media', because I can't be bothered to download a fully packaged map. Once Lucas finishes his map media downloader thing he is "working" on, then I see the point of purging less played maps. Don't forget a lot of new players aren't aware of akimbo.in and, really, 50MB is not that big of amount of data anyway.

Speaking of missing media, I heard missing files cause fps to drop, can anybody confirm this?

@Z3R0: try voting ac_iceroad_rework on oNe servers.

Fun fact: rattrap got 1 vote, aqueous - 6, douze - 7, from 1053 votes in total
Thanks given by:


Messages In This Thread
RE: More official maps, or less official maps? - by SKB - 15 Sep 12, 12:32PM